2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of spectral element and discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Navier–Stokes equations in nonhydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric modeling: Equation sets and test cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

50
349
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(399 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
50
349
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is of paramount importance that state-of-the-art NWP models account for non-hydrostatic effects with increased resolution. This work is conducted using the Non-hydrostatic Unified Model of the Atmosphere (NUMA) [14] which we believe is well placed to meet this goal. NUMA has the following features: a) non-hydrostatic, b) high-order element based Galerkin (EBG) methods for spatial discretization, c) unified regional and global NWP, d) static/dynamic Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR), e) high-order explicit, implicit-explicit (IMEX) and fully implicit temporal discretization, f) scalable to millions of CPUs [29] and thousands of GPUs [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is of paramount importance that state-of-the-art NWP models account for non-hydrostatic effects with increased resolution. This work is conducted using the Non-hydrostatic Unified Model of the Atmosphere (NUMA) [14] which we believe is well placed to meet this goal. NUMA has the following features: a) non-hydrostatic, b) high-order element based Galerkin (EBG) methods for spatial discretization, c) unified regional and global NWP, d) static/dynamic Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR), e) high-order explicit, implicit-explicit (IMEX) and fully implicit temporal discretization, f) scalable to millions of CPUs [29] and thousands of GPUs [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the realm of atmospheric modeling, the first use of high order CG appeared in [17,12] and that of high order DG methods in [14,30]. CG has been the most popular choice for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) in solid mechanics, however, DG is becoming more popular in the computational fluid dynamics field due to several desirable properties it possesses [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system of Eq. (1) is just one of several possibilities to write the equations governing the atmosphere (for alternatives see, for instance, [41,42]). In addition, here we do not formally define the physical parametrization terms P and Q, as they are not relevant for the purpose of this review.…”
Section: Equations Modeling the Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We understand that the naming convention of strong versus weak is somewhat unusual, but we point out that we use this convention here in order to remain consistent with the terminology in our previous work (e.g. [9,25,30,31]). It should be understood that the weak and strong forms mentioned here both represent weak formulations of the continuous problem (perhaps weak form and strong weak form are more apt).…”
Section: Semi-discrete Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%