1974
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1974.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of the Dose Response of Mouse Skin to Cigarette Smoke Condensate

Abstract: Summary.-Smoke condensate from two types of cigarette, dissolved in two solvents, has been applied regularly to the backs of mice at each of seven different dose levels. Treatment was continued 3 times weekly for up to 110 weeks, by which time 509 of the 1428 treated mice had developed skin tumours. The dependence of tumour incidence on age was adequately described by the Weibull distribution. The relationship between dose of smoke condensate and tumour incidence rate was, however, erratic. It was less regular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted in the discussion there are a priori reasons based on the findings of Davies et al (1974) why the linear relationship assumed between log dose and log b (or log WRP) might not hold at the highest dose levels tested. The detailed results of the multiple regression analysis were therefore examined to see where departures from the assumption occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the discussion there are a priori reasons based on the findings of Davies et al (1974) why the linear relationship assumed between log dose and log b (or log WRP) might not hold at the highest dose levels tested. The detailed results of the multiple regression analysis were therefore examined to see where departures from the assumption occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al (1977) have shown that virtually all the carcinogenic components of whole-smoke condensate are insoluble in water. Davies et al (1974) demonstrated that the use of a hydrophobic alcohol (isopropyl alcohol) as a solvent for condensate increased the incidence of tumours over that achieved with the usual solvents. The present study, using a hydrophilic alcohol, has reduced the incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doses of condensate used were 189 and 94-5 mg/mouse/week, each alone or with 17.5% or 35% glycerol, the balance being made up from solvent (Table I). These doses were chosen to avoid high-dose suppression and thus to give optimum tumour response (Davies et al, 1974), and to be comparable with glycerol proportions in NSM smoke condensate. Control groups received acetone/glycerol mixtures, or were handled and not otherwise treated (Table I).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%