2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the effect of impurities on CO 2 storage capacity in geological formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Eqs. (9) to (11) can now be readily solved for a complete description of the flow conditions in the ghost cell at the wellhead.…”
Section: Top Of the Wellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Eqs. (9) to (11) can now be readily solved for a complete description of the flow conditions in the ghost cell at the wellhead.…”
Section: Top Of the Wellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For storage, CO 2 is captured in fossil-fuel-based power plants and other industrial facilities. The flue gas from these sources contains not only CO 2 but also various impurities such as sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), oxygen (O 2 ), nitrogen (N 2 ), hydrogen (H 2 ), and carbon monoxide (CO) [2][3][4][5]. The process of removing these impurities to obtain pure CO 2 is costly; thus, the coinjection of impurities has an advantage in that it can reduce costs significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of removing these impurities to obtain pure CO 2 is costly; thus, the coinjection of impurities has an advantage in that it can reduce costs significantly. However, the coinjection of impurities not only corrodes injection facilities, such as pipelines and injection wells, but also adversely affects CO 2 injectivity [2,5,6]. Among these impurities, coinjection of even a small amount of SO 2 extremely acidifies the groundwater due to formation of sulfuric acid, which accelerates the dissolution/precipitation of minerals in reservoir rocks [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, some studies have investigated the influence of CO2 and associated impurities on the reservoir formation through batch experiments (Jafari Raad and Hassanzadeh, 2016;Pearce et al, 2016bPearce et al, , 2016aPearce et al, , 2015bPearce et al, , 2015aWang et al, 2015;Z. Wang et al, 2016) and geochemical modelling (Lei et al, 2016;Pearce et al, 2016a;Waldmann and Rütters, 2016;Wolf et al, 2016) for both reservoir and caprock core samples obtained from different locations around the world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al, 2016) and geochemical modelling (Lei et al, 2016;Pearce et al, 2016a;Waldmann and Rütters, 2016;Wolf et al, 2016) for both reservoir and caprock core samples obtained from different locations around the world. It was reported that the presence of impurities in the injected CO2 stream can potentially affect the reservoir storage capacity (Talman, 2015), fluids miscibility in oil and gas reservoirs (Coelho et al, 2015), solubility trapping (Li and Jiang, 2014;Ziabakhsh-Ganji and Kooi, 2014), and corrosion of well casings, which can result in environmental concerns in the case of leakage from injection facilities (Ziabakhsh-Ganji and Kooi, 2014), and increased storage cost (Wang et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%