2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the geometrical phase effect on scattering processes: Validity of the extended-Longuet–Higgins formalism for a four-fold Jahn–Teller type model system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies were coupled two (or more) adiabatic PESs via a JT- ci and in some cases quantum, state-selected, energy-dependent reactive transition probabilities were calculated. The results were then compared with corresponding single-state probabilities and were found to be similar . The disappointing conclusion from this study, just like the one we have based on the complementary line integrals, is that JT- ci s are barely capable of affecting magnitudes such as the state-selected probabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these studies were coupled two (or more) adiabatic PESs via a JT- ci and in some cases quantum, state-selected, energy-dependent reactive transition probabilities were calculated. The results were then compared with corresponding single-state probabilities and were found to be similar . The disappointing conclusion from this study, just like the one we have based on the complementary line integrals, is that JT- ci s are barely capable of affecting magnitudes such as the state-selected probabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Finally the following comment: This conclusion reminds us of reactive scattering studies performed, a few years ago, for a two-arrangement model . In these studies were coupled two (or more) adiabatic PESs via a JT- ci and in some cases quantum, state-selected, energy-dependent reactive transition probabilities were calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%