2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2008.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the material density distribution of space debris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, due to the lower ablation threshold which scales with ffiffi ffi τ p , less pulse energy is needed. Since aluminum appears to be a rather prevalent material in small-sized space debris, 30 it constitutes a good starting point for our considerations on laser-matter interaction. Following the proposals from the literature in Table 2, we performed a laser parameter study, using Polly-2T for laser-matter interaction with aluminum targets.…”
Section: Laser-matter Interaction Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, due to the lower ablation threshold which scales with ffiffi ffi τ p , less pulse energy is needed. Since aluminum appears to be a rather prevalent material in small-sized space debris, 30 it constitutes a good starting point for our considerations on laser-matter interaction. Following the proposals from the literature in Table 2, we performed a laser parameter study, using Polly-2T for laser-matter interaction with aluminum targets.…”
Section: Laser-matter Interaction Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 7,000 of them are large enough that they were not completely burnt up during reentry and eventually struck the Earth's surface. Study by Opiela (2009) concluded that 30% of payload debris consists of medium to high-density and 10% of rocket bodies are high-density with higher endurance to atmospheric ablation. Most of the survive debris will fall on the ocean such that the threat of space debris reentry is generally considered to be less risky.…”
Section: Abstrakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end ORDEM 3.0 organizes debris populations mainly by material density and associated type. This choice is encouraged by the in-situ STS (Shuttle Transportation System) database of radiator and window impacts, along with data of past ground impact tests [3][4][5][6][7]. These support a representation of on-orbit debris in terms of the material density categories -low density (1.4 g/cm 3 ), medium density (2.8 g/ cm 3 ), and high density (7.9 g/cm 3 ).…”
Section: Modeled Orbital Debris Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%