2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14137527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of the Relationship between Corporate Culture and Corporate Sustainable Performance: Evidence from Chinese SMEs

Abstract: Sustainable development is a significant issue facing small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Drawing on the literature of corporate sustainable development and the resource-based view, this study aims to examine how corporate flexibility and control culture influence sustainable performance by triggering innovation capabilities and investigate the moderating role of leadership style (i.e., transformational and transactional). The 186 matched questionnaire data from managers and employees in Chinese SMEs r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of determination R1 The table shows the relationship between the mission, institutional goals, and competitive advantage if the results showed a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, where the correlation coefficient was: (0.615), meaning that there was a direct and strong relationship. As for the coefficient of determination, it reached (0.378), meaning (37%) of the variables This means that changing the mission and goals by one percentage leads to a change in the competitive advantage by (37%) and the rest (63%) is due to other factors that are included in the model, and what confirms this relationship is the calculated value of t, which amounted to (6,354). It is a function at the level (1.15), as it came greater than the tabular t, which amounted to (4,111), and since the value of sin is less than (0.05), this leads us to accept and confirm the validity of the null hypothesis, which states (there is a statistically significant relationship between the message And the objectives and competitive advantage in the institution under study at the level of a: 0.05) and the rejection of the alternative hypothesis, which states (there is no statistically significant relationship between the mission, goals and competitive advantage in the institution under study at the level of a: 0.05) and we acknowledge the existence of a statistically significant role between the message and the gifts P and competitive advantage at the level of significance a:0.05.…”
Section: T Nepotism T Tabular T Moral Sig Correlation Coefficient R2mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coefficient of determination R1 The table shows the relationship between the mission, institutional goals, and competitive advantage if the results showed a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, where the correlation coefficient was: (0.615), meaning that there was a direct and strong relationship. As for the coefficient of determination, it reached (0.378), meaning (37%) of the variables This means that changing the mission and goals by one percentage leads to a change in the competitive advantage by (37%) and the rest (63%) is due to other factors that are included in the model, and what confirms this relationship is the calculated value of t, which amounted to (6,354). It is a function at the level (1.15), as it came greater than the tabular t, which amounted to (4,111), and since the value of sin is less than (0.05), this leads us to accept and confirm the validity of the null hypothesis, which states (there is a statistically significant relationship between the message And the objectives and competitive advantage in the institution under study at the level of a: 0.05) and the rejection of the alternative hypothesis, which states (there is no statistically significant relationship between the mission, goals and competitive advantage in the institution under study at the level of a: 0.05) and we acknowledge the existence of a statistically significant role between the message and the gifts P and competitive advantage at the level of significance a:0.05.…”
Section: T Nepotism T Tabular T Moral Sig Correlation Coefficient R2mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Hence, firms that can deliver real superior value to the customer experience via an innovative corporate strategy built on a long-term viable, sustainable basis will endure and be sustained for a long time [4,5]. Likewise, the importance of strategic planning has led to the success of thousands of large, small and medium companies and it caused an excellent competitive advantage between companies and business organizations [6]. Thus, all kinds of enterprises, mainly SMEs, are recommended to adopt new business models with resilient and innovative business strategies through which they can attain sustainability [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By creating a culture that promotes employee commitment, experimentation, and risk-taking, transformational leaders may enhance the impact of customer orientation and collaboration on organizational innovation capability. Indeed, exploring small- and medium-sized enterprises in China, Wang and Huang (2022) discovered that transformational leadership serves as a moderator for the relationship between corporate culture and innovation capability. The authors unveiled that a transformational leadership style could significantly enhance the positive relationship between a flexibility culture, “characterized by creativity, flexibility, spontaneity, and risk-taking” (Wang and Huang, 2022, p. 4), and organizational innovation capability.…”
Section: Qualitative Methodology and Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In investigating the determinants of SP, a diverse array of scholars have embraced various theoretical underpinnings and frameworks. These theories include the technology-organization-environment theory, social exchange theory, RBV, ecological modernization theory, social identity theory, natural RBV, dynamic capability theory and sustainable supply chain management framework, as discussed by Alraja et al (2022), Wang and Huang (2022), Al-Hakimi et al (2022a), Chowdhury et al (2022) and Iqbal and Ahmad (2021). However, it is important to highlight that the primary focus of these studies has been on emerging economies, specifically Oman (Alraja et al , 2022), Saudi Arabia (Al-Hakimi et al , 2022a), China (Lin et al , 2022; Wang and Huang, 2022), Colombia (Acosta-Prado and Tafur-Mendoza, 2022), Vietnam (Chowdhury et al , 2022) and Pakistan (Iqbal et al , 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theories include the technology-organization-environment theory, social exchange theory, RBV, ecological modernization theory, social identity theory, natural RBV, dynamic capability theory and sustainable supply chain management framework, as discussed by Alraja et al (2022), Wang and Huang (2022), Al-Hakimi et al (2022a), Chowdhury et al (2022) and Iqbal and Ahmad (2021). However, it is important to highlight that the primary focus of these studies has been on emerging economies, specifically Oman (Alraja et al , 2022), Saudi Arabia (Al-Hakimi et al , 2022a), China (Lin et al , 2022; Wang and Huang, 2022), Colombia (Acosta-Prado and Tafur-Mendoza, 2022), Vietnam (Chowdhury et al , 2022) and Pakistan (Iqbal et al , 2021). Notably, none of the aforementioned studies have explored the interrelationships among ECs, KM and SP within the specific context of Malaysian manufacturing SMEs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%