A Study of Two-Phase Mail Survey Data Collection Methods

Montaquila, Jill M.; Brick, J. Michael; Williams, Douglas; Han, Daifeng

doi:10.1093/jssam/smt004

Cited by 20 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We used a highly proven 2-phase mail-first recruitment design to yield higher coverage and garner a higher response rate at a lower cost compared to phone-first design [17,18]. After the first mailing, a second mailing went out to non-respondents 1 month later.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for endometrial carcinoma: Prevalence of lower-extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping versus lymphadenectomy

Leitao

Zhou

Gómez-Hidalgo

et al. 2020

Gynecologic Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

h i g h l i g h t s SLN mapping was independently associated with significantly lower rate of patient-reported lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). Increasing BMI and use of adjuvant EBRT were associated with an increased prevalence of patient-reported LEL. SLN mapping in the surgical management of newly diagnosed endometrial cancer may spare these patients from LEL. Survival outcomes were similar between SLN mapping and comprehensive lymphadenectomy after endometrial cancer surgery.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for endometrial carcinoma: Prevalence of lower-extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping versus lymphadenectomy

Leitao

Zhou

Gómez-Hidalgo

et al. 2020

Gynecologic Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…55,56 Because response rates can influence the representativeness of a sample, we suggest that future studies make use of various techniques to improve the likelihood of participation. 57 Furthermore, we recognize that fathers were largely underrepresented in our sample. However, the mailed study was addressed to the household, and any available parent was eligible to answer the questionnaire.…”

Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Parents’ decision-making about the human papillomavirus vaccine for their daughters: I. Quantitative results

Krawczyk

Knaüper

Gîlca³

et al. 2015

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV) is an effective primary prevention measure for HPV-related diseases. For children and young adolescents, the uptake of the vaccine is contingent on parental consent. This study sought to identify key differences between parents who obtain (acceptors) and parents who refuse (non-acceptors) the HPV vaccine for their daughters. In the context of a free, universal, school-based HPV vaccination program in Qu ebec, 774 parents of 9-10 year-old girls completed and returned a questionnaire by mail. The questionnaire was based on the theoretical constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM), along with constructs from other theoretical frameworks. Of the 774 parents, 88.2% reported their daughter having received the HPV vaccine. Perceived susceptibility of daughters to HPV infection, perceived benefits of the vaccine, perceived barriers (including safety of the vaccine), and cues to action significantly distinguished between parents whose daughters had received the HPV vaccine and those whose daughters had not. Other significant factors associated with daughter vaccine uptake were parents' general vaccination attitudes, anticipated regret, adherence to other routinely recommended vaccines, social norms, and positive media influence. The results of this study identify a number of important correlates related to parents' decisions to accept or refuse the HPV vaccine uptake for their daughters. Future work may benefit from targeting such factors and incorporating other health behavior theories in the design of effective HPV vaccine uptake interventions.

show abstract

“…Similar results were found in subsequent attempts using this approach. 15,16 Although Brick, Andrews, and Mathiowetz 17 have also had success with a single rather than 2-phase mail survey design for rare population groups, they agree with Montaquila et al 18 that a 2-phase design is ideal when within household sampling is needed, and when the survey is lengthy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 91%

Address‐Based Sampling for Recruiting Rural Subpopulations: A 2‐Phase, Multimode Approach

Thomson¹,

Nemeth²,

Peng

et al. 2017

The Journal of Rural Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Study of Two-Phase Mail Survey Data Collection Methods

Cited by 20 publications

References 15 publications

Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for endometrial carcinoma: Prevalence of lower-extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping versus lymphadenectomy

Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for endometrial carcinoma: Prevalence of lower-extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping versus lymphadenectomy

Parents’ decision-making about the human papillomavirus vaccine for their daughters: I. Quantitative results

Address‐Based Sampling for Recruiting Rural Subpopulations: A 2‐Phase, Multimode Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About