MILCOM 1984 - IEEE Military Communications Conference 1984
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.1984.4794860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Viterbi's Ratio-Threshold AJ Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…variables. Then, the energy detector's output for obeys the exponential distribution with its PDF given by (6) where is the same as that in (4). After the normalization of by , (4) and (6) can be written as (7) (8) In (7) (9) where , represents the transmitted energy per symbol without FEC, represents the number of bits per MFSK/RS symbol, and finally, we have with a probability of , while holds with a probability of .…”
Section: System Overview and Statistics Of The Decision Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…variables. Then, the energy detector's output for obeys the exponential distribution with its PDF given by (6) where is the same as that in (4). After the normalization of by , (4) and (6) can be written as (7) (8) In (7) (9) where , represents the transmitted energy per symbol without FEC, represents the number of bits per MFSK/RS symbol, and finally, we have with a probability of , while holds with a probability of .…”
Section: System Overview and Statistics Of The Decision Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which obey the relationship of (4) According to (3), the erasure probability is constituted by two terms. The first term is based on the hypothesis of , i.e., when a symbol was detected erroneously and hence erasure is required, while the second term accrues from the unintentional erasure of a symbol, which was detected correctly, due to its mapping into .…”
Section: Erasure Insertion Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the second-stage maximum selection finds the largest one from the set , which can be expressed as (27) Let us now derive the PDFs of . Since the normalized PDF of for was given by (14), the PDF of for can be expressed as…”
Section: B Selection Combiningmentioning
confidence: 99%