2017
DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.2p.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Vowel Nasalization and Vowel Epenthesis Processes in Cameroon Francophone English

Abstract: Unlike Cameroon English and Received Pronunciation, Cameroon Francophone English has a number of nasal  and epenthetic vowels. Those nasal vowels are generally French ones, as Cameroon Francophone English is heavily influenced by that language. The epenthetic vowels found in Cameroon Francophone English as in many other non-native Englishes are difficult to explain. Part of the data analysed is drawn from past studies (Safotso 2001, 2006, 2012 & 2015; Kouega 2008). This is complemented by the oral reading … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most striking remark is that for the majority of these non-specialists of English (82.7%), the difference is very significant. The situation portrayed by the figures above confirms that the distinction between Cameroon English and Cameroon Francophone English, as established in previous studies (see, for instance, Kouega 2008, Simo Bobda 2013, Safotso 2016and 2018, and Atechi 2015b deserves to be made. The informants were also invited to indicate the speech community which approximates native English more.…”
Section: The Findingssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The most striking remark is that for the majority of these non-specialists of English (82.7%), the difference is very significant. The situation portrayed by the figures above confirms that the distinction between Cameroon English and Cameroon Francophone English, as established in previous studies (see, for instance, Kouega 2008, Simo Bobda 2013, Safotso 2016and 2018, and Atechi 2015b deserves to be made. The informants were also invited to indicate the speech community which approximates native English more.…”
Section: The Findingssupporting
confidence: 87%