2021
DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2020.1862655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on additive manufacturing build parameters as bonded joint design factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique helps us to determine the extent to which the effect of an individual variable is a major component (Girden, 2023). In very simple terms, ANOVA helps us to evaluate the influence of each factor on the outputs, identify its interactions and estimate if the factor is significant (Bergonzi et al, 2021;Frascio et al, 2019;Ghani et al, 2004).…”
Section: Optimization Of the Parameters By Analysis Of Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technique helps us to determine the extent to which the effect of an individual variable is a major component (Girden, 2023). In very simple terms, ANOVA helps us to evaluate the influence of each factor on the outputs, identify its interactions and estimate if the factor is significant (Bergonzi et al, 2021;Frascio et al, 2019;Ghani et al, 2004).…”
Section: Optimization Of the Parameters By Analysis Of Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While diverse approaches have been recommended in the literature to mitigate the above drawbacks, information related to the build volume limitation and the necessity for suitable joining techniques for sub-assemblies is still ambiguous and incomplete (Favero et al , 2019; Leicht et al , 2020; Li et al , 2020; Luo et al , 2012; Song et al , 2015; Vanek et al , 2014). Conventional bonding techniques for 3D-printed parts involve the usage of adhesives, mechanical fasteners like rivets/bolts and mechanical interlocking methods, each one of them having their own limitations (Alexei Samimi, 2019; Bergonzi et al , 2021; Dilberoglu et al , 2018; Inaniwa et al , 2013; Tiwary et al , 2021; Zhou et al , 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the material grading distribution rules are not practical right now for production purposes. The implementation of fused deposition modeling (3D printing) to the adhesive joints is now promising for the production of a functionally graded adhesive layer [32][33][34][35]. Consequently, the practice of functionally graded adhesive is still in the development stage and needs many theoretical and experimental studies that consider all aspects of adhesive material and adhesive joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is a promising technique, the usage of this technique results in the modification of the material properties due to heat generation. 28 Further, the welded zone represents the weakest link in the whole structure leading to a catastrophic failure. Furthermore, it also asks for specific equipment and setup adding to the manufacturing costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest investigations on comparing the joining techniques for AM parts was carried out by Espalin et al, 44 wherein various methods were sorted as per effectiveness of the strength including hot air welding, ultrasonic spot welding, solvent, and adhesive bonding. Numerous researchers including Bergonzi et al, 28 Frascio et al, 45 and Kovan et al 46,47 attempted to investigate the effect of FDM printing parameters including extruder temperature, raster angle, printing speed, layer thicknesses, and print orientation on the strength of the adhesively bonded parts. A remarkable finding was that improvement in the strength could be obtained by simply setting the FDM printers parameters properly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%