2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-012-0095-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on buckling of filament-wound cylindrical shells under hydrostatic external pressure using finite element analysis and buckling formula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because in contrast to ASME BPVC-X, NASA SP-8007 requires a longitudinal/circumferential wave number of buckling The FE results match well against the experimental data of Section 2.2.2. This is also confirmed in several references [7][8][9][10]12,14]. Based on these comparisons, the accuracy of design codes for the prediction of collapse strength could be considered insufficient.…”
Section: Comparison Against Engineering Standardssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is because in contrast to ASME BPVC-X, NASA SP-8007 requires a longitudinal/circumferential wave number of buckling The FE results match well against the experimental data of Section 2.2.2. This is also confirmed in several references [7][8][9][10]12,14]. Based on these comparisons, the accuracy of design codes for the prediction of collapse strength could be considered insufficient.…”
Section: Comparison Against Engineering Standardssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Farooq and Myler [25] confirmed that effective engineering constants obtained from various equations have shown a good agreement (over 90%) between laminates having different types of stacking sequences by performing tensile and bending tests. Jung et al [12] compared the buckling pressure obtained from FE analysis for different stacking and effective material properties. They concluded that a single layer with effective engineering constants is adequate.…”
Section: Effective Engineering Constants Of Laminatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed that the failure pressure of the reinforced composite cylindrical shell was much higher than the unreinforced one, and the buckling pressure of the cylindrical shell with the winding angle of [±60 • /90 • ] was the largest. Jung et al [46] selected several groups of different winding angles, such as [±30 ] FW , to conduct finite element analysis and comparative analysis of buckling criteria for the buckling characteristics of wound composite cylindrical shells under external hydrostatic pressure. It was found that the buckling pressure calculated by the ASME 2007 formula had the highest safety factor compared with the test value, and the finite element results were in good agreement with the test value.…”
Section: Elastic Bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Messager et al (2002) later developed an analytical buckling shell model based on third-order shear deformable theory and compared the results with NLFEM and experimental results. Kim et al (2010) and Jung et al (2012) compared two analytical buckling pressure formulations, i.e., the ASME and NASA formulas, with NLFEM or experimental results. Rao Yarrapragada et al (2012) used the Windenburg equation, which was developed for homogeneous materials, to predict the critical buckling pressure of composite shells with equivalent stiffness moduli, and compared the results with NLFEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%