2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69610-8_118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Car-To-Truck Rear Underride with and Without Protection Device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) and the width of the rear bumper bar (no. 4) in Figure 4, designed according to the aforementioned Asian standards R 58 referred to in [8]. Based on this standard, there are boundary conditions when designing a truck rear bumper.…”
Section: Nguyen Phu Thuong Luu and Ly Hung Anhmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) and the width of the rear bumper bar (no. 4) in Figure 4, designed according to the aforementioned Asian standards R 58 referred to in [8]. Based on this standard, there are boundary conditions when designing a truck rear bumper.…”
Section: Nguyen Phu Thuong Luu and Ly Hung Anhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passengers are also at risk when frontal collisions from the rear occur, in particular, in collisions between a passenger car and a large truck. A collision simulation between a car and a truck from the rear with and without bumpers was performed in [8]. The results showed that the rear bumper design needs to be improved to enhance the safety of small cars when a frontal rear-end collision occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorption is increased to 88.32%, achieving the goal of reducing acceleration to 15.83g and getting the job done to keep the passenger compartment to a minimum. In 2021, Anh and Luu [5] simulated a collision between a passenger vehicle and 10 tons truck. Then, compared two conditions with or without rear protection devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%