2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Physical Exercise and General Mobility in People with Cerebral Palsy: Health through Costless Routines

Abstract: Sedentary behavior (SB) is a common problem that may produce health issues in people with cerebral palsy (CP). When added to a progressive reduction in motor functions over time, SB can lead to higher percentages of body fat, muscle stiffness and associated health issues in this population. Regular physical activity (RPA) may prevent the loss of motor skills and reduce health risks. In this work, we analyzed data collected from 40 people (20 children and teenagers, and 20 adults) who attend two specialist cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exercise programs should be tailored to the individual’s mobility capabilities. There exists a diverse array of activities that have demonstrated their health and fitness benefits, including walking (both freely and on an elliptical or treadmill), cycling, employing a feet ergometer, utilizing elastic bands, participating in sports such as swimming or hockey, engaging in video-game activities, and interacting with animals [ 35 ]. However, many of these options are not viable for individuals with severe motor disabilities, such as those classified at level IV and V in the GMFCS, who primarily spend extended periods in a seated position [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exercise programs should be tailored to the individual’s mobility capabilities. There exists a diverse array of activities that have demonstrated their health and fitness benefits, including walking (both freely and on an elliptical or treadmill), cycling, employing a feet ergometer, utilizing elastic bands, participating in sports such as swimming or hockey, engaging in video-game activities, and interacting with animals [ 35 ]. However, many of these options are not viable for individuals with severe motor disabilities, such as those classified at level IV and V in the GMFCS, who primarily spend extended periods in a seated position [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FAQ and FMS measure similar mobility-related constructs. However, this construct is broad and influenced by several aspects, whether intrinsic (such as the degree of spasticity) or extrinsic (such as environmental barriers) [ 27 ]. Thus, there are nuances that differentiate the two instruments: a patient can improve or worsen the mobility and remain at the same FMS score by continuing to use the same mobility aid device, while the FAQ is more sensitive to capture differences for having higher degrees of classification (from 1 to 10) [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of cardiac activity is one of the most common elements for evaluating the state of a subject [ 1 , 2 ], whether to control possible health risks [ 3 ], monitor sports performance [ 4 ], determine the level of stress [ 5 ], etc. There are different noninvasive methods for recording cardiac activity, of which two of the most common are the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the photoplethysmogram (PPG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%