2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00256-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on recycling of abrasives in abrasive water jet machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters coincide As for the formation of possible roughness zones that can be detected, Figure 10b-d show the main effect graphs for Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3. The degree of influence of each parameter on the three variables is described below [31,[41][42][43]:…”
Section: Analysis Of Contour Graphs For Significant Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters coincide As for the formation of possible roughness zones that can be detected, Figure 10b-d show the main effect graphs for Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3. The degree of influence of each parameter on the three variables is described below [31,[41][42][43]:…”
Section: Analysis Of Contour Graphs For Significant Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments were conducted by considering two different pressures of water, two different abrasive mass flow rates, five different traverse speeds and three different mesh sizes of abrasive particles, so as to produce kerfs with different depths. The particle size distribution in each mesh size and the average diameter of abrasive particles were obtained from the works of Chetty and colleagues, 35,36 since the same type of garnet was used in these experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, sharper particles also tend to be much smaller than the average diameter of particles and do not contribute significantly to the material removal. 1,35–37…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this process possesses various tangible benefits such as precise machining, high productivity, and versatility to cut DTM materials, a significant portion (approximately 50%) of the operating cost of AWJM goes to the buying, feeding, treatment, and recycling of abrasive particles. 54,55 Moreover, in some applications such as food processing and bio-medical field, the problem of high contamination of the abrasive particles to the work surface arises. This requires sustainable innovations in AWJM technology so as to minimize its environmental footprints and cost, simultaneously ensuring the best quality machining.…”
Section: Nonconventional Machining and Sustainable Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%