2014 14th International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iwaenc.2014.6954293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on speech quality and speech intelligibility measures for quality assessment of single-channel dereverberation algorithms

Abstract: This paper reports on the evaluation of several objective quality measures for predicting the quality of the dereverberated speech signals. The correlations between subjective quality assessment for single-channel dereverberation techniques and objective speech quality as well as speech intelligibility measures are analyzed and discussed. Six different single-channel dereverberation algorithms were included in the evaluation to account for different types of distortions. The subjective quality was assessed alo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the selected instrumental measures do not always show completely consistent results [37,38]. Nevertheless, some common tendencies can clearly be observed, which will be summarized next.…”
Section: Instrumental Speech Quality Measuresmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the selected instrumental measures do not always show completely consistent results [37,38]. Nevertheless, some common tendencies can clearly be observed, which will be summarized next.…”
Section: Instrumental Speech Quality Measuresmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Since various instrumental speech quality measures exist which can be used to assess the quality of denoised and dereverberated signals [37][38][39] and since it is difficult to assess the quality using only one single measure, the performance of the proposed system has been evaluated using the five signal-based quality measures suggested in [26], i.e., the speech to reverberation modulation energy ratio (SRMR) [40], the cepstral distance (CD) [41], the log likelihood ratio (LLR) [41], the frequency-weighted segmental SNR (FWSSNR) [41], and the perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) [42].…”
Section: Instrumental Speech Quality Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the computation of the recognition rate, only the letter and the number in the utterance are evaluated, as in the CHiME challenge [45]. Furthermore, two signal-based measures for the overall speech quality are evaluated, which were shown to be significantly correlated to the perceived amount of reverberation [46]: PESQ [47] and the frequency-weighted segmental signal-to-noise ratio (fwSegSNR) [41]. We use the wideband version of PESQ and give values in the MOS-LQO scale.…”
Section: Measures and Evaluation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher value for PESQ and a lower value for CD and RDT indicate a better performance. These measures exhibit a high correlation with subjective listening tests evaluating the quality of the dereverberated speech signals [38]. The improvements obtained in PESQ, denoted by ∆PESQ, and the reductions obtained in CD and RDT, denoted by ∆CD and ∆RDT, respectively, for the considered dereverberation methods are shown in the subsequent sections for better readability.…”
Section: A Evaluation Setup and Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 85%