2013
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.63.1824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the dependence of exposure dose reduction and image evaluation on the distance from the dental periapical X-ray machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical studies have shown that early diagnosis of breast cancer could improve treatment results and reduce the female cancer-related deaths significantly [2]. X-ray mammography is the gold standard breast imaging tool [3]. However, this technique has some limitations, including ionizing radiation [4], less sensitive for earlystage tumor detection [5], and not suitable for dense breast or women under 40 years of age [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical studies have shown that early diagnosis of breast cancer could improve treatment results and reduce the female cancer-related deaths significantly [2]. X-ray mammography is the gold standard breast imaging tool [3]. However, this technique has some limitations, including ionizing radiation [4], less sensitive for earlystage tumor detection [5], and not suitable for dense breast or women under 40 years of age [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancer is one of the most severe health issues in women worldwide [1]. Although X-ray mammography is the current standard breast imaging tool [2], it has some limitations, such as uses harmful radiations, unsuitable for pregnant women and dense breasts [3]. Microwave imaging (MI) is a relatively cost-effective and promising tool for the diagnosis of various diseases, including lung cancer [4], breast cancer [5]- [7], brain stroke [8], [9], heart disease [10], and bone cancer [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques have some limitations. X-ray produces harmful radiation to the human body [ 2 ], and it is difficult for early abnormal tissue detection due to the relatively small contrast between the healthy tissue and the abnormal tissue at X-ray frequencies. PET is an excellent choice for imaging soft tissues, but it suffers from poor image resolution and relatively high-cost [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%