2011
DOI: 10.5194/hessd-8-6419-2011
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the derivation of a mean velocity formula from Chiu's velocity formula and bottom shear stress

Abstract: Abstract. This study proposed a new discharge estimation method using a mean velocity formula derived from Chiu's 2D velocity formula of probabilistic entropy concept and the river bed shear stress of channel. In particular, we could calculate the mean velocity, which is hardly measurable in flooding natural rivers, in consideration of several factors reflecting basic hydraulic characteristics such as river bed slope, wetted perimeter, width, and water level that are easily obtainable from rivers. In order to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Φ ( M ) = 0.88 (Hii River data of Shinohara and Tsubaki (1959)) and Φ ( M ) = 0.91 (Leo‐River data of Leopold (1969)) were reported by Choo et al. (2011). The entropy parameter depends on both the suspended sediment rate and aspect ratio (flow width/flow depth).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, Φ ( M ) = 0.88 (Hii River data of Shinohara and Tsubaki (1959)) and Φ ( M ) = 0.91 (Leo‐River data of Leopold (1969)) were reported by Choo et al. (2011). The entropy parameter depends on both the suspended sediment rate and aspect ratio (flow width/flow depth).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The magnitudes of Φ(M) for the present study were in agreement with the data reported for small rivers for example, 0.66 < Φ(M) < 0.80 for natural channels in the United States (Chiu et al, 2000), 0.6 < Φ(M) < 0.68 for Tiber River in Italy (Moramarco et al, 2019), 0.63 < Φ(M) < 0.69 for Godavari and Ulhas Rivers in India (Vyas et al, 2021), and for large rivers for example, 0.4 < Φ(M) < 0.61 for Amazon River in Brazil (Bahmanpouri et al, 2022). Also, Φ(M) = 0.88 (Hii River data of Shinohara and Tsubaki (1959)) and Φ(M) = 0.91 (Leo-River data of Leopold (1969)) were reported by Choo et al (2011). The entropy parameter depends on both the suspended sediment rate and aspect ratio (flow width/flow depth).…”
Section: Calculation Of the Entropy Parametermentioning
confidence: 93%