2019
DOI: 10.13045/jar.2018.00220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Effectiveness of Korean Medicine Treatment for Patients’ Involved in Traffic Accidents and the Analysis of Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Korean Medicine Treatment - A Retrospective Review

Abstract: Background: This study was conducted to verify the effectiveness and effectiveness-related factors of Korean medicine (KM) treatment for patients who have been involved in traffic accidents (TA). Methods: The medical records of 150 TA patients hospitalized in Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Medicine Hospital from September 2017 to May 2018 were reviewed. Medical records included information on patient demographic characteristics, TA situations, use of KM treatment, clinical characteristics, 4 scales [numer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each outcome measure showed statistically significant improvements between baseline and Visit 8. These results could indicate that there was a therapeutic effect of the KM treatments on TA-related symptoms and it was in accordance with the results of previous studies that showed improvement in TA patient symptoms following KM treatments [37,38]. Between Visit 8 and 9, however, significant improvements were only observed in pain reduction (VAS and NRS) and not in other secondary assessments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Each outcome measure showed statistically significant improvements between baseline and Visit 8. These results could indicate that there was a therapeutic effect of the KM treatments on TA-related symptoms and it was in accordance with the results of previous studies that showed improvement in TA patient symptoms following KM treatments [37,38]. Between Visit 8 and 9, however, significant improvements were only observed in pain reduction (VAS and NRS) and not in other secondary assessments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%