2012
DOI: 10.4084/mjhid.2012.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Expression of BCR-Abl Transcript in Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia (Mpal) Cases Using the Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Reaction Assay (Rt-Pcr) and Its Correlation With Hematological Remission Status Post Initial Induction Therapy

Abstract: Introduction:The MPAL comprise 2–5% of all acute leukemia. The present WHO 2008 classification has separated two groups in MPAL based on t(9;22) positivity and MLL rearrangement.Aims & Objectives:The aim of the present pilot study is to note the frequency of BCR-ABL transcript in MPAL cases using the RT-PCR assay and to correlate the status with hematological remission post induction.Materials & Methods:A total of 10 MPAL cases classified on Flow-cytometry based on the current WHO 2008 criteria were enrolled. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was not only consistent with other studies (Cetin et al, 2012;Ernst et al, 2012;Mu et al, 2012) but also a beneficial complement to other studies. It was reported in some early reports that m-bcr might be frequent in B lymphoid progenitor cells but uncommon in hematopoietic stem cells, explaining the rarity of m-bcr in CML but M-bcr and m-bcr per se can induce the myeloproliferative process, resulting in promotion of chronic phase CML (Bhatia et al, 2012;Gokbuget et al, 2012). These reports also showed that in patients showed a higher incidence of expression of m-bcr than M-bcr in ALL (Lee et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: 9961 Clinical Significance Of Bcr-abl Fusion Gene Subtypes mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This result was not only consistent with other studies (Cetin et al, 2012;Ernst et al, 2012;Mu et al, 2012) but also a beneficial complement to other studies. It was reported in some early reports that m-bcr might be frequent in B lymphoid progenitor cells but uncommon in hematopoietic stem cells, explaining the rarity of m-bcr in CML but M-bcr and m-bcr per se can induce the myeloproliferative process, resulting in promotion of chronic phase CML (Bhatia et al, 2012;Gokbuget et al, 2012). These reports also showed that in patients showed a higher incidence of expression of m-bcr than M-bcr in ALL (Lee et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: 9961 Clinical Significance Of Bcr-abl Fusion Gene Subtypes mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Using the WHO 2008 criteria, MPAL shows a lower frequency (0·5–2·8%) compared to EGIL system (2–5%), indicating that the number of patients encompassed in this new MPAL category is significantly lower (Al‐Seraihy et al , ; Atfy et al , ; Matutes et al , ; Bhatia et al , ; Yan et al , ). MPAL affects both adults and children (including infants) and shows a male predominance.…”
Section: Egil Scoring System For Balmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytogenetic abnormalities are very common in ALAL. Cytogenetic analysis reveals clonal chromosomal abnormalities in 59–91% of patients with MPAL (Lee et al , ; Al‐Seraihy et al , ; Gerr et al , ; Atfy et al , ; Matutes et al , ; Bhatia et al , ; Yan et al , ) and in 80–90% of patients with AUL (Cuneo et al , ; Heesch et al , ). Clonal chromosome abnormalities are numerical (involving changes in chromosome number), structural (including mainly translocations and deletions) or both numerical and structural.…”
Section: The Significance Of Cytogenetics In Alalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leukemic cells of MPAL have features of both myeloid and lymphoid lineage, and MPAL comprises 0.5-3% of all acute leukemias (2)(3)(4)(5). In the 2008 WHO criteria, MPAL was classified into five subtypes, and Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) MPAL accounts for 20-40% of MPAL (2,3,6). Although the prognosis of Ph+MPAL is poor, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for Ph+ MPAL (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%