2016
DOI: 10.7837/kosomes.2016.22.1.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Hydrodynamic Effect of Biofouling on Marine Propeller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Jangmok 1 hull-fouling macroinvertebrates included 19 species, with a mean density of 16,616 ind./m 2 and a biomass of 3937 gWWt/m 2 . The groups included arthropods (11 species), polychaetes (5), mollusks (2), and other taxa (2). The mean densities were as follows: arthropods 16,257 ind./m 2 (97.8%) with many barnacles, mollusks at 178 ind./m 2 (1.1%), polychaetes at 80 ind./m 2 (0.5%), and other taxa at 101 ind./m 2 (0.6%).…”
Section: Jangmokmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Jangmok 1 hull-fouling macroinvertebrates included 19 species, with a mean density of 16,616 ind./m 2 and a biomass of 3937 gWWt/m 2 . The groups included arthropods (11 species), polychaetes (5), mollusks (2), and other taxa (2). The mean densities were as follows: arthropods 16,257 ind./m 2 (97.8%) with many barnacles, mollusks at 178 ind./m 2 (1.1%), polychaetes at 80 ind./m 2 (0.5%), and other taxa at 101 ind./m 2 (0.6%).…”
Section: Jangmokmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIS can cause biodiversity loss and change community structure through the local elimination of native species [2][3][4]. NIS can be introduced by ships and negatively impact marine ecosystems by destroying the habitats of native species, changing species compositions and reducing marine resources [5,6]. Ports are the main focus of NIS, and artificial structures are becoming spots of introduction [2,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anderson et al [30] conducted a study and found that clean propeller has the favourable cost benefits compared to a roughened propeller. Seo et al [31] developed an algorithm and investigated the impacts of biofouling on a propeller performance in open water. The authors` results showed that biofouling present on the propeller increases the torque with increasing fouling rate and therefore, a loss of efficiency is experienced.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the hull, the presence of fouling increases the roughness of the surface, hence increasing frictional resistance (Schultz, 2004;Kempf, 1937). On the propeller, the presence of fouling increases the roughness of the blade surface, thus requiring more power to maintain the same speed (Atlar et al, 2002;Seo et al, 2016;Owen et al, 2018). Fouling represents the primary cause of hull (Candries et al, 2003) and propeller (Khor and Xiao, 2011) performance degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%