1976
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600033128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the pollination mechanism in field beans (Vicia faba L.)

Abstract: Inbred lines and hybrids of English tick and horse beans and exotic stocks were studied with respect to pod set, floral structure and pollen production and germination to find out why most inbred lines set few or no seeds without tripping whereas most hybrids and some inbred lines set equally well with or without tripping. The most important outcome was new information on variation between genotypes in flower structure and pollen quantity and on how these two characters affect the mechanics of self-pollination… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterotic autofertility of F 1 plants was initially considered to be a result of the presence of a larger quantity of pollen grains over their inbred parents (Drayner 1959;Kambal, Bond, and Toynbee-Clarke 1976;Stoddard and Bond 1987). In contrast, additively inherited autofertility in inbred lines may involve subtle changes to floral morphology (Kambal, Bond, and Toynbee-Clarke 1976;Suso and Moreno 2004) together with early rupture of the stigmatic cuticle and release of the stigmatic exudate (Paul et al 1978;Lord and Heslop-Harrison 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterotic autofertility of F 1 plants was initially considered to be a result of the presence of a larger quantity of pollen grains over their inbred parents (Drayner 1959;Kambal, Bond, and Toynbee-Clarke 1976;Stoddard and Bond 1987). In contrast, additively inherited autofertility in inbred lines may involve subtle changes to floral morphology (Kambal, Bond, and Toynbee-Clarke 1976;Suso and Moreno 2004) together with early rupture of the stigmatic cuticle and release of the stigmatic exudate (Paul et al 1978;Lord and Heslop-Harrison 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in floral structure have been associated with differences in the amount and timing of the deposition of pollen on the stigma (Kambal et al ., 1976 ;Lord & Heslop-Harrison, 1984), and advanced to explain autofertility . We consider these less likely to be important in moderate to highly autofertile genotypes, because pollen can usually be found on stigmas of such plants prior to flower opening .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambiguity surrounds the relative importance of each mechanism, but it seems reasonable to suppose that the chemistry of the pollenstigma interaction should exert greater control in autofertile genotypes than would spatial separation of pollen . In some genotypes, self pollen is found on stigmas before the flower opens (Kambal, 1969 ;Paul et al ., 1978) but it need not necessarily germinate on every stigma (Kambal et al ., 1976 ;Rowland et al ., 1983), nor guarantee the pistil will be fertilized . A high correlation between pollination (pollen on stigma) and pistil fertilization has been observed in crops of spring beans in England (Stoddard, 1986a), and also under Australian conditions (Marcellos & Perryman, 1988) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors should enhance overall pollination rates of a crop but may also increase the proportion of self pollen received [52]. For crop systems such as the field bean, which benefit from both self and non-self pollen [53], this will not necessarily have a negative impact, but for others the optimum size of the reward to deliver maximum yields may need to be more carefully assessed.…”
Section: Manipulating Floral Rewardmentioning
confidence: 99%