A study on the prevalence of acute and chronic malnutrition and influence of feeding practices among 6 months to 2 years children in rural field practice area of Kilpauk Medical College, Tamil Nadu

Abstract

Background: In India, 54% of under five children death mainly due to under nutrition. First two years of age is most critical. Nutritional status was assessed by using WHO standard growth chart. Wasting represents acute malnutrition, stunting with chronic, underweight represents both acute and chronic. Based on NFHS-3 data the prevalence of under nutrition rise up to 2 years of age, thereafter more or less stabilizes. Faulty feeding practices plays major role in under nutrition. Hence, this study carried out to assess nutritional status of 6 months to 2 years children in terms of acute and chronic malnutrition and to estimate the association of nutritional status with feeding practices.Methods: Cross sectional study done during March to August 2016. Sample size estimated was 180. Stratified random sampling method used to collect data among children in Peerkankaranai.Results: Mean age of children was 15.82 months. About 61.2% belonged to 12 to 24 months age group. Sex distributions were equal. About 55% belongs to middle socioeconomic status. The prevalence of underweight was 31.65, wasting 15%, stunting 45.6%. Male children affected by chronic malnutrition more than female children. Not initiating breast feeding within 4 hours of birth plays significant role in acute malnutrition. Prevalence of malnutrition was high among those not practising colostrum feeding and exclusive breast feeding. Only 15 mothers not influenced by formula feeding. Feeding frequency and traditional feeding practices had main role in chronic malnutrition.Conclusions: The prevalence of under nutrition among study population was high among this area. Feeding practices should be improved among the mothers.

Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety and Depression among Perinatal Women in Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…In our study, we found a significant result between pregnancy risk and depression which is supported by the results from the study conducted by Kalra et al 23 About half of the participants had cesarean section pregnancy and majority if the participants were housewives which is similar to the study conducted by Kamali. 24 The prevalence of anxiety in our study is similar to Rezaee and Framarzi. 15 The prevalence of depression in our study was found to be 38.25% which is similar to the study conducted by Lee et al 25 More than one half and more than one-third of the women had antenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms, respectively, in at least one antenatal assessment.…”

Untitled

“…Sailaja et al (2016) [10] found out the prevalence of underweight, stunting, and wasting among infants and young children aged 6 to 24 months to be 44.60, 37.70, and 20.78 per cent respectively. In their study, Dhanalakshmi and Selvaraj (2019) [3] revealed prevalence of underweight, wasting, and stunting was found to be 31.65, 15.00 and 45.60 per cent respectively.…”