A Study on the Uncertainty of a Laser Triangulator Considering System Covariances

Abstract

A laser triangulation system, which is composed of a camera and a laser, calculates distances between objects intersected by the laser plane. Even though there are commercial triangulation systems, developing a new system allows the design to be adapted to the needs, in addition to allowing dimensions or processing times to be optimized; however the disadvantage is that the real accuracy is not known. The aim of the research is to identify and discuss the relevance of the most significant error sources in laser triangulator systems, predicting their error contribution to the final joint measurement accuracy. Two main phases are considered in this study, namely the calibration and measurement processes. The main error sources are identified and characterized throughout both phases, and a synthetic error propagation methodology is proposed to study the measurement accuracy. As a novelty in uncertainty analysis, the present approach encompasses the covariances of correlated system variables, characterizing both phases for a laser triangulator. An experimental methodology is adopted to evaluate the measurement accuracy in a laser triangulator, comparing it with the values obtained with the synthetic error propagation methodology. The relevance of each error source is discussed, as well as the accuracy of the error propagation. A linearity value of 40 µm and maximum error of 0.6 mm are observed for a 100 mm measuring range, with the camera calibration phase being the main error contributor.

Multi-Sensor Laser System for Electric Guitar Pitch-Detection

“…A primary obstacle in this scenario was ensuring laser safety, given that the system operated in real-time with an optical power exceeding 5 mW of continuous power. A third and final solution, thoroughly investigated in this study, revolves around the utilization of an optical triangulator [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. This approach strikes a delicate balance between complexity, cost, and performance.…”

Improved laser measurement using advanced techniques: A review

“…It was found that the calibration process has been the main error source which contributed over 97% of the maximum error deflection. 30 Based on this condition, a calibration process is necessary for a precise measurement result. The traditional calibration usually requires precise movement or precise gauge, which needs a high extra cost.…”

“…In 2020, Pablo Puerto et al analyzed the relevance of the main error sources in a laser system using the Monte Carlo method. It was found that the calibration process has been the main error source which contributed over 97% of the maximum error deflection 30 . Based on this condition, a calibration process is necessary for a precise measurement result.…”