2015
DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.163600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study to evaluate cephalometric hard tissue profile of Tamil population for orthognathic surgery

Abstract: The primary aim of this study is to compare, the cephalometric hard tissue profile values and analysis between Tamil and Caucasian population. The study also aims to create a better understanding in the facial proportions of Tamil Nadu population and to have better diagnosis and treatment planning for orthognathic surgery for Tamil population in Tamil Nadu.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altemus (1960) acknowledged that it is all because individual of different races and ethnic have contrast in skeletal, soft-tissue, and dental. Alcalde et al (1998), Craven (1958), and Hajighadimi et al (1981), they all claimed that cephalometric norms very clear for each ethnic groups according to the previous, cephalometric norms of Caucasians have been noted that there are a big difference according to those of Indians (Atit et al, 2013), Tamils Nachiappan et al, 2015), Arabs (Hassan, 2006), Nepalese (Sharma, 2011), Turkish (Kilic et al, 2010), Japanese (Ioi et al, 2007), Chinese (Gu et al, 2011), Korean (Hwang et al, 2002), Pakistani (Khan et al, 2013), and African (Fadeju et al, 2013) populations. These distinctions ought to be considered in orthodontic finding and treatment planning just as in orthognathic surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Altemus (1960) acknowledged that it is all because individual of different races and ethnic have contrast in skeletal, soft-tissue, and dental. Alcalde et al (1998), Craven (1958), and Hajighadimi et al (1981), they all claimed that cephalometric norms very clear for each ethnic groups according to the previous, cephalometric norms of Caucasians have been noted that there are a big difference according to those of Indians (Atit et al, 2013), Tamils Nachiappan et al, 2015), Arabs (Hassan, 2006), Nepalese (Sharma, 2011), Turkish (Kilic et al, 2010), Japanese (Ioi et al, 2007), Chinese (Gu et al, 2011), Korean (Hwang et al, 2002), Pakistani (Khan et al, 2013), and African (Fadeju et al, 2013) populations. These distinctions ought to be considered in orthodontic finding and treatment planning just as in orthognathic surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%