2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility and impact of packaged interventions (“Diarrhea Pack”) for prevention and treatment of childhood diarrhea in rural Pakistan

Abstract: BackgroundDiarrhea remains one of the leading public health issues in developing countries and is a major contributor in morbidity and mortality in children under five years of age. Interventions such as ORS, Zinc, water purification and improved hygiene and sanitation can significantly reduce the diarrhea burden but their coverage remains low and has not been tested as packaged intervention before. This study attempts to evaluate the package of evidence based interventions in a “Diarrhea Pack” through first l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some research entails on interventions for the prevention of diarrhoea just to focus on the perspective of hygiene (Dreibelbis, Freeman, Greene, et al, 2014;Galvez, Neish, Balabarca, et al, 2010;Jenkins, Anand, Revell, et al, 2013) or diarrhoea case management, such as the use of ORS (Ghimire, Pradhan, & Maskey, 2010;Habib, Soofi, Sadiq, et al, 2013). However, other factors can interfere in the prevalence of childhood diarrhoea, such as the care with food (Agustina, Sari, Satroamidjojo, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research entails on interventions for the prevention of diarrhoea just to focus on the perspective of hygiene (Dreibelbis, Freeman, Greene, et al, 2014;Galvez, Neish, Balabarca, et al, 2010;Jenkins, Anand, Revell, et al, 2013) or diarrhoea case management, such as the use of ORS (Ghimire, Pradhan, & Maskey, 2010;Habib, Soofi, Sadiq, et al, 2013). However, other factors can interfere in the prevalence of childhood diarrhoea, such as the care with food (Agustina, Sari, Satroamidjojo, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors have argued that there is insufficient evidence on efficacy and effectiveness of community management of pneumonia [ 12 ], the data suggest that if the WHO-iCCM algorithm [ 30 ] could be followed by CHWs, the implementation of iCCM alone in this predominantly rural setting would lead to 32.7 % increase in the number of children with pneumonia symptoms receiving appropriate antibiotics, and a 40.0 % increase in the number of children with diarrhoea receiving ORS. The high ORS uptake combined with low zinc uptake highlights the need to explore the untapped strategy of co-packaging ORS and zinc, which has proven to improve uptake of diarrhoea treatment elsewhere [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet careful consideration of the common challenges CHWs face delivering high quality care in an isolated rural environment is needed, especially to address lack of supervision and drug supply, which negatively affect CHW performance and subsequently programme outputs [ 12 , 33 35 ]. There is also a need to implement and evaluate simple interventions that can increase uptake of zinc, like co-packaging of ORS with zinc, as these might serve to improve overall uptake of effective diarrhoeal treatments [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other evaluations of prepackaged medicines had similarly favorable findings. There were high levels of acceptability and utilization of contents among mothers in Pakistan provided with a prepackaged intervention, including oral rehydration salts and Zinc tablets distributed for home use and aimed at diarrhea treatment for their young children [ 18 ]. A “mama kit” implemented in Uganda containing preventative malaria treatment was also accepted by the pregnant women to whom it was administered [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%