2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2017.7943590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sub-arcsecond pointing stability fine stage for a high altitude balloon platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the literature, dynamical models of the balloon-borne system are rarely integrated in the control design. Instead, the control gains are generally tuned empirically based on ground testings [3,30,[35][36][37][38][39], with simple control structures such as Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) gains [18,32,33,[40][41][42] possibly with some dynamic filters [2,43,44]. To the authors knowledge, there exists no general model-based methodology for controller synthesis in the literature, and, more critically, experimental ground-based setups are not representative of the dynamics of the fully deployed system in flight (which cannot be obtained in laboratory due to the dimensions of the system), whereas flight experience proves that the lineof-sight control is essentially limited by the rejection of the natural pendulum-like modes of the flight chain [2], excited by wind disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the literature, dynamical models of the balloon-borne system are rarely integrated in the control design. Instead, the control gains are generally tuned empirically based on ground testings [3,30,[35][36][37][38][39], with simple control structures such as Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) gains [18,32,33,[40][41][42] possibly with some dynamic filters [2,43,44]. To the authors knowledge, there exists no general model-based methodology for controller synthesis in the literature, and, more critically, experimental ground-based setups are not representative of the dynamics of the fully deployed system in flight (which cannot be obtained in laboratory due to the dimensions of the system), whereas flight experience proves that the lineof-sight control is essentially limited by the rejection of the natural pendulum-like modes of the flight chain [2], excited by wind disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once an accurate dynamical model is obtained, it is possible to address the pointing control of the optical instrument on-board the gondola, generally a telescope [3,5,[19][20][21] or siderostat [7,22,23]. Most often, simple control structures such as Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) gains are chosen [13,21,22,[24][25][26] and the control gains are tuned empirically based on ground testings [3,19,[27][28][29][30][31]. There exists no general model-based methodology for controller synthesis, and, more critically, experimental ground-based set-ups are not representative of the dynamics of the fully deployed system in flight, whereas flight experience proves that the line-of-sight control is essentially limited by the rejection of the natural modes of the flight chain excited by wind disturbances [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space-borne missions relating to earth observation, astrometry and meteorology, raise stringent requirements for vibration mitigation and pointing performance [1]- [4]. For instance, the solar observations satellite (SOLAR-B) imposes requirement on short-term pointing stability of 0.06 arcsec and the Nearby Earth Astrometric Telescope (NEAT) is designed to achieve sub-micro-arcsecond (0.05 µ as) pointing stability for extremely-high-precision astrometric measurements [3], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%