Starved animals often exhibit elevated locomotion, which has been speculated to partly resemble foraging behavior and facilitate food acquisition and energy intake. Despite its importance, the neural mechanism underlying this behavior remains unknown in any species. In this study we confirmed and extended previous findings that starvation induced locomotor activity in adult fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster. We also showed that starvationinduced hyperactivity was directed toward the localization and acquisition of food sources, because it could be suppressed upon the detection of food cues via both central nutrient-sensing and peripheral sweet-sensing mechanisms, via induction of food ingestion. We further found that octopamine, the insect counterpart of vertebrate norepinephrine, as well as the neurons expressing octopamine, were both necessary and sufficient for starvationinduced hyperactivity. Octopamine was not required for starvation-induced changes in feeding behaviors, suggesting independent regulations of energy intake behaviors upon starvation. Taken together, our results establish a quantitative behavioral paradigm to investigate the regulation of energy homeostasis by the CNS and identify a conserved neural substrate that links organismal metabolic state to a specific behavioral output.T he CNS plays an essential role in energy homeostasis (1). It actively monitors changes in the internal energy state and modulates an array of physiological and behavioral responses to enable energy homeostasis. Foraging behavior is critical for the localization and acquisition of food supply and hence energy homeostasis. It has been extensively documented both in ethological settings (2, 3) and under well-controlled laboratory conditions (4). Laboratory rodents with limited food access exhibit stereotypic food anticipatory activity (FAA) several hours before the mealtime, which is characterized by a steady increase in locomotion and other appetitive behaviors (5). The neural substrate that drives FAA still remains elusive (5, 6). Notably, the regulation of FAA seems to be dissociable from that of feeding behavior (7,8). These results hint at the presence of an independent and somewhat discrete regulatory mechanism of foraging behavior.Foraging behavior has also been extensively studied in invertebrate species such as the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans (9) and fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster (10). Roundworm populations exhibit two naturally emerged foraging patterns: "solitary" worms disperse across the bacterial lawn, and "social" worms aggregate along the food edge and form clumps (9). This behavioral dimorphism is controlled by natural variations of the npr-1 (neuropeptide receptor resemblance) gene that encodes a receptor homologous to the receptor family of orexigenic neuropeptide Y in mammals (9). A comparable scenario has also been identified in larval fruit flies (10), with two distinct forms of foraging present in nature: "rover" and "sitter." On food sources, sitter but not rover reduces moving speed ...