Comments of a signijicant other can enhance learning; television may even be capable of mediating itself.With experience, viewers of television have been able to acquire the skills to interpret, evaluate, and appreciate what they watch, Adults may exercise such skills, for example, by asking of a program or commercial, "How realistic is the portrayed action and its consequences?' "Does it correspond with other sources of information?" and "Does it agree with my own attitudes and beliefs?" However, such attempts to analyze television content are at best infrequent among adults. Children have been observed to be even less sophisticated viewers. They often do not understand the plots of programs (see 26) or the implied consequences of portrayed acts (e.g., 4), and do not critically evaluate products advertised on TV (e.g., 42,43). They have a lower order of mental skills, fewer analytical abilities, and less experience with the world with which to interpret, understand, and critically appreciate television programming.Thus it may be argued that in order for children to be in any sense critical television viewers, they need adult assistance. Parents, older siblings, and teachers apparently can have a direct and substantial impact upon children's understanding of the factual and value implications of television portrayals (1,8,9,10,22,32,34,37) by providing a limited commentary on what children view. The mere presence of an adult as a co-viewer (see 2, 28) is insufficient-interaction directed toward the program is the critical element. However, families rarely discuss television commercials being viewed (42), and little family interaction occurs with regard to television content (19), despite documented paren-