A suitable woman: The coming-of-age of the ‘third world woman’ at the bottom of the pyramid: A critical engagement

Abstract

While the slogan ‘Make Poverty Business’ has become integral to neoliberal discourses on global poverty management, what often goes unremarked is the role of women, especially poor third world women in profitable poverty ventures. Taking the ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’ (BOP) approach as an entry point, the present article brings into sharpened focus the centrality of poor third world women in the ‘global order of poverty management.’ Drawing on Foucaultian notions of problematization, combined with feminist insights on the stakes involved in instrumentalizing women and their subjectivities, and a Marxist-inspired notion of immaterial labor, the article examines how poor third world women are incorporated into profitable poverty eradication ventures. I argue that the construal of poor third world women as knowable objects of knowledge and entrepreneurial subjects remains at the heart of the BOP programmatic. Where, at one level, poor third world women’s participation lends ethical credence to the BOP projects; at another level, their immaterial labor helps to build ‘economies of affect’ at the bottom of the pyramid. Located at the intersection of neoliberalism and feminism, the article aims to add to the ongoing debates on the uneasy proximity between women’s empowerment and ‘neoliberal reason.’

Feminist solidarity building as embodied agonism: An ethnographic account of a protest movement

“…Neoliberalism has provided further challenges to solidarity projects by intensifying the tendency towards individualism and away from collective modes of thought and action (Arruzza et al, 2019; Vacchani & Pullen, 2019). It has, and continues to, appropriate forms of feminism for its own commodified agenda, where women's aspirations, interests and capacities are mobilized for market ends (Hopkinson & Aman, 2017) and ‘women's empowerment [is conflated with] neoliberal reason’ (Chatterjee, 2019, p. 378).…”

Webs of oppression: An intersectional analysis of inequalities facing women activists in Palestine

“…Scholars have provided thoughtful analyses that unpack how gender inequalities and gendered biases pervade and embed themselves within organizations through gendered organizational structures (Acker, 1990), invisible processes of power (Kanter, 1977) or within genderblind culture (Runté and Mills, 2006). Despite many notable theoretical and empirical contributions, and decades of feminist activism, contemporary scholars assert that organizations remain central sites for sexism (Ahmed, 2015), male dominance (Kalemba, 2019) and the instrumentalization of women and their subjectivities (Chatterjee, 2020).…”

The hegemony of men in global value chains: Why it matters for labour governance

“…Similarly, within corporate-led welfare programmes, power relations should ostensibly be re-balanced given the emphasis on ‘empowerment’ of workers (Tornhill, 2019). Yet defining women as ‘profitable subjects’ (Chatterjee, 2020: 10) does little to challenge systemic forms of gender, race and other oppressive social stratification (Özkazanç-Pan 2019). Participants are often selected based on demonstrations of compliance with programme agendas (Tornhill, 2019); the primary outcome is the promise of economic empowerment, however low quality the actual work itself.…”