2020
DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2020.576740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Suite of Tools for Continuous Land Change Monitoring in Google Earth Engine

Abstract: Land cover has been designated by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) as an Essential Climate Variable due to its integral role in many climate and environmental processes. Land cover and change affect regional precipitation patterns, surface energy balance, the carbon cycle and biodiversity. Accurate information on land cover and change is essential for climate change mitigation programs such as UN-REDD+. Still, uncertainties related to land change are large, in part due to the use of traditional land … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remote sensing (RS) data have a long history in mapping forest disturbances. Optical sensors, in particular, have been widely used to automatically map forest disturbances across the globe at different spatial scales through several different approaches, including (1) bi-temporal analyses of image pairs [9][10][11], (2) time series segmentation [12,13], and (3) near-real-time monitoring of forest disturbances [14,15]. Results indicate that simple bi-temporal methods are not suitable for large-scale monitoring because they depend too much on data availability and imply calibrations that are difficult to generalize [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing (RS) data have a long history in mapping forest disturbances. Optical sensors, in particular, have been widely used to automatically map forest disturbances across the globe at different spatial scales through several different approaches, including (1) bi-temporal analyses of image pairs [9][10][11], (2) time series segmentation [12,13], and (3) near-real-time monitoring of forest disturbances [14,15]. Results indicate that simple bi-temporal methods are not suitable for large-scale monitoring because they depend too much on data availability and imply calibrations that are difficult to generalize [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We flag deforestation when magnitude values are less than zero NDFI units. We produce intra-annual deforestation maps for the period 2000-2020, following Arévalo et al, (2020) processing tools; we then reclassify the Hansen et al (2013) tree cover dataset in 2000 as transformed (tree cover canopy < 50%) and non-transformed (tree canopy cover >50%). The non-transformed tree cover map in 2000 was updated using the deforestation events detected by CCDC for each conflict period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our underestimation of this browning trend may come from the global regression method (TSR) because several intra-annual NDVI differences were omitted. In future studies, the piecewise regression will be used and the breakpoints in the time series data will be detected with a time series analysis method, i.e., Breaks For Additive Seasonal and Trend (BFAST) [58][59][60], CCDC [61] or LandTrendr [62], which have been implemented into Google Earth Engine's platform [63][64][65]. Widespread active layer detachments and retrogressive thaw slumps exist in the low arctic tundra zone of Yamal, West Siberia [35].…”
Section: Limitations Of Our Methods On Greenness Trends Over the Russian Arcticmentioning
confidence: 99%