2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sulfatase-activatable AIEgen nanoprobe for inhalation imaging-guided surgical excision of lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we made further efforts to study the reaction kinetics of Hcy-SA with sulfatase. A closer exploration indicated that the enzymatic Michaelis–Menten constants ( K m ) and maximum reaction rate ( V max ) of Hcy-SA toward sulfatase were calculated to be 9.34 μM and 6.02 μM/min, respectively (Figure S14), which were comparable to the literature reported values. Such a small Michaelis constant suggested the excellent affinity of Hcy-SA with sulfatase. In addition, PA intensities at 700 nm (PA700 intensity) of Hcy-SA treated with different concentrations of sulfatase (0.0–20 U/L) were also recorded to verify the quantitative analysis feasibility of Hcy-SA for sulfatase by PA mode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Next, we made further efforts to study the reaction kinetics of Hcy-SA with sulfatase. A closer exploration indicated that the enzymatic Michaelis–Menten constants ( K m ) and maximum reaction rate ( V max ) of Hcy-SA toward sulfatase were calculated to be 9.34 μM and 6.02 μM/min, respectively (Figure S14), which were comparable to the literature reported values. Such a small Michaelis constant suggested the excellent affinity of Hcy-SA with sulfatase. In addition, PA intensities at 700 nm (PA700 intensity) of Hcy-SA treated with different concentrations of sulfatase (0.0–20 U/L) were also recorded to verify the quantitative analysis feasibility of Hcy-SA for sulfatase by PA mode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, the NIRF712 intensity had a good linear relationship with the concentrations of sulfatase in the range of 0.3–12 U/L, and the estimated detection limit is 0.23 U/L (Figure B). It is noteworthy that this sensitivity was superior to that of the existing fluorescent probes, indicating that Hcy-SA provided a highly sensitive means for sulfatase detection. Molecular docking experiments were carried out to further illustrate the excellent sensitivity of Hcy-SA to sulfatase. As shown in Figure S13, and Tables S2 and S4, Hcy-SA molecules approached the hydrophobic interspace of sulfatase by the hydrophobic interaction with LEU 68, ALA 69, VAL 91, and GLN 153, and the π-cation interactions with LYS 302, indicating the excellent binding ability of Hcy-SA toward sulfatase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TPE-derivative with a sulfatase recognition unit self-assembled into nanoparticles which could be activated by the catalytic domain of sulfatase to afford hydrophobic DQM-OH, which shows fluorescence on and can further interact with the hydrophobic site of sulfatase to generate stronger fluorescence. 66 As cancer cells are reported to show high sulfatase activity, the probe showed a time-dependent fluorescence enhancement in H460 and A549 cells due to the increased formation of DQM-OH (Fig. 7E).…”
Section: Monitoring and Detecting Intracellular Environment Changesmentioning
confidence: 86%