1975
DOI: 10.3133/ofr75141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A summary of relative ages of lunar nearside and farside plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Areally small geologic units often cannot be dated accurately by counts of craters because too few have formed after the units were deposited. The technique is based on a model for crater erosion developed by Soderblom and Lebofsky (1972) and refined and applied by Boyce (1976;Soderblom and Boyce, 1972;Boyce et al, 1974;. The method is a quantitative descendant of a system for dating small craters devised by Trask (1969Trask ( , 1971 which was successfully applied to mare surfaces being considered for Apollo landings (fig.…”
Section: Crater Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Areally small geologic units often cannot be dated accurately by counts of craters because too few have formed after the units were deposited. The technique is based on a model for crater erosion developed by Soderblom and Lebofsky (1972) and refined and applied by Boyce (1976;Soderblom and Boyce, 1972;Boyce et al, 1974;. The method is a quantitative descendant of a system for dating small craters devised by Trask (1969Trask ( , 1971 which was successfully applied to mare surfaces being considered for Apollo landings (fig.…”
Section: Crater Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Courtesy E. A. Whitaker (1972). (1973,1975); Boyce et al (1974Boyce et al ( , 1975; Boyce (1976); ). 3.…”
Section: Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9; Soderblom and Boyce, 1972;Boyce and Dial, 1974;Boyce and others, 1974). More recent work (Boyce and Dial, 1975;Boyce, 1976 (Shoemaker, 1970;Soderblom and Lebofsky, 1972;Soderblom and Boyce, 1972;Boyce, 1975).…”
Section: Relative Ages Of Lunar Plainsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous research has included extensive remote sensing dating work on mare basalts in the Oceanus Procellarum region. Boyce et al (1974) [42] and Boyce (1976) [43] used crater morphology methods to establish a model age of 2.5 Ga for Oceanus Procellarum, considering Aristarchus as the youngest area, with a model age of 1.7 Ga. Young (1977) [44] conducted CSFD measurements in the northern part of Oceanus Procellarum, suggesting that lunar mare volcanic activity may have persisted until ~1.97 Ga to ~1.57 Ga. Schultz and Spudis (1983) [45] proposed that basalts surrounding the Lichtenberg crater in the middle of Oceanus Procellarum are younger than 1 Ga. Hiesinger et al (1998;2002; [5,18,19,25,[46][47][48] classified mare basalt units using Clementine data and determined mare basalt ages through CSFD measurements. In the Oceanus Procellarum region, mare basalts have been determined to have ages ranging from ~3.7 Ga to ~1.2 Ga, with the youngest mare basalts located around the Aristarchus plateau, considering the Oceanus Procellarum and Mare Imbrium regions as the youngest areas [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%