2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A superlinearly convergent Mach-uniform finite volume method for the Euler equations on staggered unstructured grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, in the collocated scheme, the faces mass flow have to be computed using Eq. (22). Analogously, in the staggered scheme, the cell-centred velocities have to be reconstructed from the face-centred ones using either STAGG1 or STAGG2 reconstruction method.…”
Section: Predictor -First Step L D 1/mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In short, in the collocated scheme, the faces mass flow have to be computed using Eq. (22). Analogously, in the staggered scheme, the cell-centred velocities have to be reconstructed from the face-centred ones using either STAGG1 or STAGG2 reconstruction method.…”
Section: Predictor -First Step L D 1/mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(22). Analogously, in staggered schemes, the cell-centred velocities u nC1 i;c have to be reconstructed from the face-centred mass fluxes using either STAGG1 or STAGG2 reconstruction method.…”
Section: Corrector -Second Step L D 2/mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of pressure correction techniques for compressible Navier-Stokes equations may be traced back to the seminal work of Harlow and Amsden [20,21] in the late sixties, who developed an iterative algorithm (the so-called ICE method) including an elliptic corrector step for the pressure. Later on, pressure correction equations appeared in numerical schemes proposed by several researchers, essentially in the finite-volume framework, using either a collocated [10,23,26,30,33,34] or a staggered arrangement [2,4,7,22,24,25,37,38,[40][41][42] of unknowns; in the first case, some corrective actions are to be foreseen to avoid the usual odd-even decoupling of the pressure in the low Mach number regime. Some of these algorithms are essentially implicit, since the final stage of a time step involves the unknown at the end-of-step time level; the end-of-step solution is then obtained by SIMPLE-like iterative processes [10,23,25,26,30,34,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these algorithms are essentially implicit, since the final stage of a time step involves the unknown at the end-of-step time level; the end-of-step solution is then obtained by SIMPLE-like iterative processes [10,23,25,26,30,34,39]. The other schemes [2,7,22,24,33,37,38,40,42,43] are predictor-corrector methods, where basically two steps are performed sequentially: first a semi-explicit decoupled prediction of the momentum or velocity (and possibly energy, for non-barotropic flows) and, second, a correction step where the end-of step pressure is evaluated and the momentum and velocity are corrected, as in projection methods for incompressible flows (see [5,36] for the original papers, [29] for a comprehensive introduction and [19] for a review of most variants). The Characteristic-Based Split (CBS) scheme (see [31] for a recent review or [44] for the seminal paper), developed in the finite-element context, belongs to this latter class of methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%