2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21043-3_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Supervised Method of Feature Weighting for Measuring Semantic Relatedness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i,j , y (2) i,j+1 , x, j) , (10) where {f (1) g } is a set of features for advice-revealing sentence extraction (see Table 2), {f (2) m } is a set of features for context sentence extraction (see Section 5.1), and {λ (1) g } and {λ (2) m } are the respective weights for each of two feature sets. In this integrated solution, we modified features for context extraction described in Section 5.1 since advice revealing sentences are unknown when the extraction algorithm is executed at the first time.…”
Section: Using Multiple Linear Crfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…i,j , y (2) i,j+1 , x, j) , (10) where {f (1) g } is a set of features for advice-revealing sentence extraction (see Table 2), {f (2) m } is a set of features for context sentence extraction (see Section 5.1), and {λ (1) g } and {λ (2) m } are the respective weights for each of two feature sets. In this integrated solution, we modified features for context extraction described in Section 5.1 since advice revealing sentences are unknown when the extraction algorithm is executed at the first time.…”
Section: Using Multiple Linear Crfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This similarity measure is used to bridge the lexical gap between an advice-revealing sentence and its context sentence candidates. We use a sentence relatedness measure provided in Open Roget's project [10]. Feature-3.…”
Section: Extracting Context Sentences Individuallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• apply the supervised measures of semantic relatedness from (Kennedy and Szpakowicz 2011) and (Kennedy and Szpakowicz 2012) to the updating of Roget's Thesaurus, and evaluate it carefully; • propose and compare three methods of automatically adding words to Roget's Thesaurus; • build the updated editions of the 1911 and 1987 versions of Roget's Thesaurus; • create new datasets for pseudo-word-sense disambiguation and the selection of the best synonym;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%