2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2011.2156806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Supervised Patch-Based Approach for Human Brain Labeling

Abstract: We propose in this work a patch-based image labeling method relying on a label propagation framework. Based on image intensity similarities between the input image and an anatomy textbook, an original strategy which does not require any non-rigid registration is presented. Following recent developments in non-local image denoising, the similarity between images is represented by a weighted graph computed from an intensity-based distance between patches. Experiments on simulated and in-vivo MR images show that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
312
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
312
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[Rohlfing et al, 2004;Warfield et al, 2004;Heckemann et al, 2006]. The second group of patch-based methods has recently enjoyed increased attention [Coupé et al, 2011;Rousseau et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2012]. Here, the label proposal is estimated for each point in the target image by a local similarity-based search in the atlas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Rohlfing et al, 2004;Warfield et al, 2004;Heckemann et al, 2006]. The second group of patch-based methods has recently enjoyed increased attention [Coupé et al, 2011;Rousseau et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2012]. Here, the label proposal is estimated for each point in the target image by a local similarity-based search in the atlas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Rousseau et al [26] applied the block-wise strategy proposed by Coupe et al [33] to nonlocal means label fusion resulting in slightly better segmentations than those obtained by a voxel-based implementation. In fact, the block-based approach not only provides a reduction of the computational load by processing only every other in all three dimensions as done by Coupe et al [33] but it also introduces an implicit regularization in the labels due to the overlap between blocks which increases the number of patches involved in the voting process for each voxel.…”
Section: Block-wise Nonlocal Means Estimator Multi-label Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As originally proposed by Coupé et al [23], our method is based on a nonlocal means label fusion where labels from multiple templates are weighted according to the Euclidean distance between patch intensities. Using this approach we avoid the one-to-one matching assumption of nonlinear registration label fusion methods by enabling a one-to-many matching, therefore reducing the segmentation errors [23,25,26] by better managing the inherent inter-subject variability of human brain anatomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work, Buades et al [5] shows that non-local means filtering gives state-of-the-art performance in structurepreserving image denoising. The strategy has also been applied to brain image labeling [6], image registration [8], and MR image super-resolution [9]. We employ nonlocal averaging for combining all matching patches that have been determined based on the distance measure as described in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Non-local Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core of our proposed method is fuzzy patch matching, which is inspired by recent advances in non-local image processing, e.g., for denoising [5], labeling [6], segmentation [7]. First, a new patch distance measure is proposed for determining matching patches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%