2008
DOI: 10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.10.3326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Support Vector Machine-Based Gender Identification Using Speech Signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, which show the trade-off between the reduction of P fa (false-alarm probability) and the increase in detection probability (P d ), are displayed for all test files. From the results, we can see that the proposed algorithm outperformed the previous method [6] in discriminating gender at the relevant intervals. The test results confirm that the optimally weighted MFCC improves the performance of gender identification in actual conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, which show the trade-off between the reduction of P fa (false-alarm probability) and the increase in detection probability (P d ), are displayed for all test files. From the results, we can see that the proposed algorithm outperformed the previous method [6] in discriminating gender at the relevant intervals. The test results confirm that the optimally weighted MFCC improves the performance of gender identification in actual conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this section, we briefly review the notion of the support vector machine incorporating the MFCCs used for gender identification [6]. At first, let…”
Section: Support Vector Machine-based Gender Identification Employingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some other classifiers have also been used. For 1 -Automatic Speech Recognition 2 -Hidden Markov Model example Lee and Lang (2008) used SVM 3 [6] and Silvosky and Nouza (2006) used GMM 4 [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%