2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2628-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A surface and sub-surface quality evaluation of three cast iron grades after grinding under various cutting conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Zeng et al [ 66 ] found that mechanically polished CoCrMo alloys exhibited hardened surface layers (containing martensitic phases and deformation twins), although they tended to be only ≈1 μm or so in thickness. Much deeper deformed layers have been found in other cases, with a sensitivity to alloy type being found for various cast irons [ 67 ] and steels. [ 68,69 ]…”
Section: Microstructural (“Sample‐specific”) Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, Zeng et al [ 66 ] found that mechanically polished CoCrMo alloys exhibited hardened surface layers (containing martensitic phases and deformation twins), although they tended to be only ≈1 μm or so in thickness. Much deeper deformed layers have been found in other cases, with a sensitivity to alloy type being found for various cast irons [ 67 ] and steels. [ 68,69 ]…”
Section: Microstructural (“Sample‐specific”) Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Before the microhardness measurements, ground workpieces were sanded employing silicon carbide sandpapers with 220, 320, 600, 800, 1000, and 1200 mesh and then polished using alumina paste of 0.1 µm size (metallography technique). Although the choice of carrying out the polishing process before measuring microhardness was due to in other works on grinding, the polishing process was also used successfully before the measurement of microhardness, as in a study developed by Silva et al [28], Moraes et al [29], Srivastava et al [30], Javaroni et al [31], and Garcia et al [32]. The microhardness was evaluated using a SHIMADZU HMV-2 series hardness tester with a Vickers penetrator (Barueri, Brazil).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known from machining theory that as temperature decreases during machining, workpiece hardness and strength increase rapidly, what results in higher grinding force, thereby impairing the grindability of the cast iron when using conventional abrasive grinding wheel. In a recent work carried out by Da Silva et al [28], the authors evaluated the surface and subsurface quality of three cast iron grades, that includes cast iron one, during grinding under various cutting conditions. They tested only the conventional coolant delivery technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, this flow rate was adopted as standard in most of works in grinding developed in the same laboratory in which the current work was carried out. One of these works is that carried out by Da Silva et al [28] in grinding of several cast iron grades.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%