2009
DOI: 10.1109/titb.2009.2025373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A surface registration method for quantification of intraoperative brain deformations in image-guided neurosurgery

Abstract: Intraoperative brain deformations decrease accuracy in image-guided neurosurgery. Approaches to quantify these deformations based on 3-D reconstruction of cortectomy surfaces have been described and have shown promising results regarding the extrapolation to the whole brain volume using additional prior knowledge or sparse volume modalities. Quantification of brain deformations from surface measurement requires the registration of surfaces at different times along the surgical procedure, with different challen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to sparse surface data digitization for IGLS, registration has been performed using manual swabbing with a tracked probe [14], laser-range scanning [5], ultrasound [1], [15], [16], time of flight imaging [17], stereoscopic imaging [18], [19], and conoscopic holographic surface scanning [20]. Recently, we did a comprehensive study comparing registration results using swabbing, laser range scanning, and conoscopic holographic scanning in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to sparse surface data digitization for IGLS, registration has been performed using manual swabbing with a tracked probe [14], laser-range scanning [5], ultrasound [1], [15], [16], time of flight imaging [17], stereoscopic imaging [18], [19], and conoscopic holographic surface scanning [20]. Recently, we did a comprehensive study comparing registration results using swabbing, laser range scanning, and conoscopic holographic scanning in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'Apuzzo and Verius 2 used a three-dimensional (3-D) monitoring system (three cameras) to track points in a brain phantom, with reference points painted on the surface. Sun et al, 3 Paul et al, 4 DeLorenzo et al, 5 Hsieh et al, 6 Vivanti et al, 7 and Kumar et al 8 (two cameras) also tracked points on the brain surface, but in this case automatically extracted.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landmarks selection repeatability was measured and turned out to be in the same order of magnitude of the navigation system registration error, which is reported to be <1 mm [30]. According to previous studies, the possibility of performing repeated measurements on the same points is a benefit, since it allows monitoring of the brain surface changes over time [31]. First, we point out that the low variability of β is mainly because 10 out of 12 patients considered in this study underwent temporal resection and head placement in this kind of procedure is standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%