A survey and comparative analysis of the various routing protocols of Internet of Things

Agnihotri, Shailja; Ramkumar, K.

doi:10.1108/ijpcc-03-2017-0023

Cited by 20 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…New IoT mobile-based paradigms already have notoriety in a wide range of domains (e.g., smart home, vehicles, and cities) [Al-Fuqaha et al 2015]. Several authors have surveyed a bulk of applications and challenges in such IoMT context showing the relevance and applicability of this study [Agnihotri andRamkumar 2017, Nahrstedt et al 2016].…”

Section: Nature Of the Problem And Its Relevancementioning

confidence: 92%

Routing and Mobility Management in the Internet of Things

Santos¹,

Vieira²,

Loureiro³

2020

Anais Estendidos Do Simpósio Brasileiro De Redes De Computadores E Sistemas Distribuídos (SBRC Estendido 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Ph.D. Thesis proposes new techniques for routing and mobility management for Internet of Things (IoT). In the future IoT, everyday mobile objects will probably be connected to the Internet. Currently, static IoT's devices have already been connected, but handle mobile devices suitably still being an open issue in IoT context. Then, solutions for routing mobility detection, handover, and mobility management are proposed through an algorithm that integrates Machine Learning (ML) and mobility metrics to figure out devices' mobility events, which we named Dribble. Also, an IPv6 hierarchical routing protocol named Mobile Matrix to boost efficient (memory and fault tolerance) end-to-end connectivity over mobility scenarios. The Thesis contributions are supported by numerous peer-reviewed publications in national and international conferences and journals included in ISI-JCR. Also, the applicability of this Thesis is evident by showing that our results overcome state-of-the-art in static and mobile scenarios, as well as, the impact of the proposed solutions is a step forward in at least two new research areas so-called Internet of Mobile Things (IoMT) and Social IoT, where devices move around and do social ties respectively. Moreover, during the Ph.D. degree, the author has contributed to different computer network fields rather than routing by publishing in areas like social networks, smart cities, intelligent transportation systems, software-defined networks, and parallel computing.

show abstract

Section: Nature Of the Problem And Its Relevancementioning

confidence: 92%

Routing and Mobility Management in the Internet of Things

Santos¹,

Vieira²,

Loureiro³

2020

Anais Estendidos Do Simpósio Brasileiro De Redes De Computadores E Sistemas Distribuídos (SBRC Estendido 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to the research [7], it is evident that the embedded nodes of sensors can be addressed directly using internet protocol version six (IPv6) and the Internet that owes to the adaptation layer 6LoWPAN. In this context, the IETF Operating Association routed the ROLL in 2012, and set the introduction of RPL-IPv6 protocol for routing for the ROLL to offer an efficient and effective routing solution for the abstraction of layer 6LoWPAN [8]. The abstraction layer runs over 802.15.4 IEEE standard offering MAC and PHY for reduced rate wireless personal area network (WPAN).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

P System Framework for Ant Colony Algorithm in IoT Data Routing

Gedminas¹,

Duoba²,

Navakauskas³

2020

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a critical part of current information technology. When designing IoT data routes, device limited resources such as the computation speed, available amount of memory, remaining battery power or channel bandwidth, to name a few, must be considered. Since the Ant Colony System (ACS) is successfully applied to solving different routing problems, the implementation of ACS for routing in the IoT has also been considered. A P system inspired by the nature of membrane processes not only simplifies a complex system behavior annotation but also delivers a good balance between performance, flexibility and scalability. For this reason, the P system framework for ACS in IoT data routing has been investigated. From the research conducted, MMAPS, which is a combination of the P system and the Max-Min Ant System, is seen to perform better than the ACS.

show abstract

“…There are existing reviews on network optimization that present frameworks for non-blockchain networks [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. There are also reviews for blockchain optimization frameworks, which discuss optimized consensus algorithms, thus reducing computational complexity and storage requirements [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Network Optimization Techniques for Blockchain Systems

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increase of the Internet of Things (IoT) calls for secure solutions for industrial applications. The security of IoT can be potentially improved by blockchain. However, blockchain technology suffers scalability issues which hinders integration with IoT. Solutions to blockchain’s scalability issues, such as minimizing the computational complexity of consensus algorithms or blockchain storage requirements, have received attention. However, to realize the full potential of blockchain in IoT, the inefficiencies of its inter-peer communication must also be addressed. For example, blockchain uses a flooding technique to share blocks, resulting in duplicates and inefficient bandwidth usage. Moreover, blockchain peers use a random neighbor selection (RNS) technique to decide on other peers with whom to exchange blockchain data. As a result, the peer-to-peer (P2P) topology formation limits the effective achievable throughput. This paper provides a survey on the state-of-the-art network structures and communication mechanisms used in blockchain and establishes the need for network-based optimization. Additionally, it discusses the blockchain architecture and its layers categorizes existing literature into the layers and provides a survey on the state-of-the-art optimization frameworks, analyzing their effectiveness and ability to scale. Finally, this paper presents recommendations for future work.

show abstract

A survey and comparative analysis of the various routing protocols of Internet of Things

Cited by 20 publications

References 20 publications

Routing and Mobility Management in the Internet of Things

Routing and Mobility Management in the Internet of Things

P System Framework for Ant Colony Algorithm in IoT Data Routing

A Survey on Network Optimization Techniques for Blockchain Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About