2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-008-0184-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey and taxonomy of performance improvement of canonical genetic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 168 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several automatic programming algorithms using ACO have been presented so far, the use of the term AP to refer to this paradigm is of late onset. Actually, until Salehi‐Abari and White presented a work comparing GP against AP for symbolic regression, AP was just considered as a kind of ACO variant of GP or a GP hybridization, like in Ref but not as an independent metaheuristic. Only the work by Rojas and Bentley considered the possibility of a new trend of research regarding natural computation approaches for automatic programming.…”
Section: The Ap Metaheuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several automatic programming algorithms using ACO have been presented so far, the use of the term AP to refer to this paradigm is of late onset. Actually, until Salehi‐Abari and White presented a work comparing GP against AP for symbolic regression, AP was just considered as a kind of ACO variant of GP or a GP hybridization, like in Ref but not as an independent metaheuristic. Only the work by Rojas and Bentley considered the possibility of a new trend of research regarding natural computation approaches for automatic programming.…”
Section: The Ap Metaheuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%