2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2012.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey and taxonomy of name systems in mobile ad hoc networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is necessary to identify nodes using other types of identifiers. In the present literature of ad hoc networks, it is observed that assignment and resolution of names are carried out by various mechanisms [9]. For realization of naming and name resolution in ad hoc networking scenario nodes are required to exchange control packets which cause overhead for their functioning.…”
Section: Using Identifier For Path Establishment Ieee 80211s [32]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, it is necessary to identify nodes using other types of identifiers. In the present literature of ad hoc networks, it is observed that assignment and resolution of names are carried out by various mechanisms [9]. For realization of naming and name resolution in ad hoc networking scenario nodes are required to exchange control packets which cause overhead for their functioning.…”
Section: Using Identifier For Path Establishment Ieee 80211s [32]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For naming support it requires the naming and name resolution services [9] for identification support.…”
Section: Name Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…information"s [3][4][5][6][7], to enforce cooperation [8] but they have serious limitations in terms of routing overhead and attacks. Work to be done in the area of Address allocation [17], name resolution [18,19] shows that the implementation of these services with the current design of MANET creates complexity and heavy network overhead.…”
Section: House Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%