2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Ampullectomy Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though endoscopic resection of these tumors has been practiced for more than twenty years, there is not yet consensus on the upper limit of the size of tumors suitable for endoscopic resection, the preprocedural staging protocol (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), intra-ductal ultrasonography (IDUS), contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)), technique of papillectomy, need for biliary sphincterotomy, or timing of pancreatic stent placement and follow-up of patients after resection. 5,6 Although endoscopic resection is safer than surgery, it still carries the risk of early complications like bleeding (2-15%), perforation (0-4%), cholangitis (0-2%) and acute pancreatitis (8-15%), as well as late complications like papillary stenosis (0-8%). 7,8 Researchers are constantly striving to develop technology and techniques to prevent, minimize or effectively handle these complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though endoscopic resection of these tumors has been practiced for more than twenty years, there is not yet consensus on the upper limit of the size of tumors suitable for endoscopic resection, the preprocedural staging protocol (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), intra-ductal ultrasonography (IDUS), contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)), technique of papillectomy, need for biliary sphincterotomy, or timing of pancreatic stent placement and follow-up of patients after resection. 5,6 Although endoscopic resection is safer than surgery, it still carries the risk of early complications like bleeding (2-15%), perforation (0-4%), cholangitis (0-2%) and acute pancreatitis (8-15%), as well as late complications like papillary stenosis (0-8%). 7,8 Researchers are constantly striving to develop technology and techniques to prevent, minimize or effectively handle these complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most endoscopists place a small stent (3-5 Fr) for a short period (3 days). 5,12 Some keep the stent in situ until the next surveillance endoscopy (1-2 months) as the pancreatic stent may protect the organ from pancreatitis if resection or thermal ablation is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, surgery was the preferred approach but now endoscopy has been shown to be a good alternative first line therapy. Though endoscopic resection of these tumors has been practiced for more than twenty years, there is not yet consensus on the upper limit of the size of tumors suitable for endoscopic resection, the preprocedural staging protocol (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), intra‐ductal ultrasonography (IDUS), contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)), technique of papillectomy, need for biliary sphincterotomy, or timing of pancreatic stent placement and follow‐up of patients after resection 5,6 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, no consensus on the type of stent that should be used or the optimal duration of placement. Most endoscopists place a small stent (3–5 Fr) for a short period (3 days) 5,12 . Some keep the stent in situ until the next surveillance endoscopy (1–2 months) as the pancreatic stent may protect the organ from pancreatitis if resection or thermal ablation is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation