2007
DOI: 10.1109/comst.2007.4317616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of application-layer multicast protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0
16

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
100
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when real conditions (such as bandwidths, delays, or displaying screen sizes) do not allow, upper layers can be discarded along the transmission link or at any middle box (relaying entities) for the bit-stream to be fit-in with those conditions without corrupting the video communication session. Beside scalable video coding, modern multimedia services often rely on Application Layer Multicast (ALM) [2] to serve a large group of subscriber with heterogeneous network and terminal capacities (e.g., IPTV, video conferencing services...). The key concept of ALM is the implementation of multicasting functionality as an application service instead of a network service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when real conditions (such as bandwidths, delays, or displaying screen sizes) do not allow, upper layers can be discarded along the transmission link or at any middle box (relaying entities) for the bit-stream to be fit-in with those conditions without corrupting the video communication session. Beside scalable video coding, modern multimedia services often rely on Application Layer Multicast (ALM) [2] to serve a large group of subscriber with heterogeneous network and terminal capacities (e.g., IPTV, video conferencing services...). The key concept of ALM is the implementation of multicasting functionality as an application service instead of a network service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPM is also prone to flooding attacks and billing issues [12]. On other hand, ALM can be implemented as an overlay of unicast links that provides a virtual multicast network [13]. ALM overcomes the challenges of IPM but provides less efficiency in terms of bandwidth and delay.…”
Section: Fig 2 Application Layer Multicasting [13]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, in our work, we aim to construct a set of delivery trees that achieves our optimization goal. Numerous work have studied multi-tree packing for peerto-peer application-layer multicast protocols (see [38] for a survey). The goal is to span all nodes under application-related optimization objective (e.g., to minimize tree height, or to reduce controlling overhead).…”
Section: ) Overall Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%