1999
DOI: 10.1108/eum0000000007157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of author attitudes and skills in relation to article publishing in paper and electronic journals

Abstract: The present paper details research conducted into various aspects of author experience, attitudes and perceptions of publishing in paper and electronic journals. A sample of 1,040 authors in a variety of disciplines was identified as having published a journal article in the preceding year. A questionnaire was distributed to these authors and 537 usable replies were received. The questionnaire was analysed in terms of author experience in the paper and electronic domains, authors’ views on various aspects of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the earliest surveys on authors' awareness, experience, and concerns for OA possibilities was Schauder's (1994) project among scholars in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States for “an assessment of the position of academics in relation to electronic publishing” (p. 73). Since then, surveys on this topic, though with diverse respondents, have been undertaken in every consecutive year until the new millennium (e.g., Anderson, Sack, Krauss, & O'Keefe, 2001; Björk & Turk, 2000; Budd & Connaway, 1997; Lancaster, 1995; McKnight & Price, 1999; Palmer, Speier, Wren, & Hahn, 2000; Shamp, 1992; Speier, Palmer, Wren, & Hahn, 1999; Sweeney, 2000; Tomney & Burton, 1998). These reports presented a clear picture of the early perceptions and practices of digital scholarly communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest surveys on authors' awareness, experience, and concerns for OA possibilities was Schauder's (1994) project among scholars in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States for “an assessment of the position of academics in relation to electronic publishing” (p. 73). Since then, surveys on this topic, though with diverse respondents, have been undertaken in every consecutive year until the new millennium (e.g., Anderson, Sack, Krauss, & O'Keefe, 2001; Björk & Turk, 2000; Budd & Connaway, 1997; Lancaster, 1995; McKnight & Price, 1999; Palmer, Speier, Wren, & Hahn, 2000; Shamp, 1992; Speier, Palmer, Wren, & Hahn, 1999; Sweeney, 2000; Tomney & Burton, 1998). These reports presented a clear picture of the early perceptions and practices of digital scholarly communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They disseminate their research findings and advance new ideas in books, conference papers, research reports, and journals. The journals, however, are perceived as the most prestigious and strongest of all the various outlets (Mcnight and Price 1999). Thus, publishing in journals indicates the quality and capability of an academician in undertaking research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever surveys of scholars' opinions about scholarly publishing have taken place, the maintenance of peer-review systems has been a top-priority requirement (The Royal Society, 1981;Rowland, 1982;McKnight and Price, 1999;ALPSP,1999ALPSP, , 2001ALPSP, , 2002.…”
Section: Scholars' Views On Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%