1991
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-53863-1_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of behaviour and equivalence preserving refinements of petri nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without loss of generality, we assume that each transition in N performs at most one action. In particular, in states s 4 , s 5 and s 7 , Fig. 4 excludes producing a token in q for the second time before any token has been consumed from p; thus excluding the example in Fig.…”
Section: Some Transitions Should Not Occurmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without loss of generality, we assume that each transition in N performs at most one action. In particular, in states s 4 , s 5 and s 7 , Fig. 4 excludes producing a token in q for the second time before any token has been consumed from p; thus excluding the example in Fig.…”
Section: Some Transitions Should Not Occurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nice overview of fundamental refinement techniques for Petri nets is given in [4,29]. In the context of component-based systems and service-oriented technologies, a lot of research considers communicating systems, see e.g., [14,26,27], in combination with some variants of soundness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phenomena, in turn, can be quantified using the causal behavioural profile. Moreover, work on equivalence-preserving refinements for Petri nets, refer to [38] for a thorough survey, illustrates that common notions of equivalence are preserved solely under certain refinement operators. Similarly, work on net morphisms [39] and behaviour inheritance [40,41] shows that any extension of a net has to be done in a structured manner in order to preserve common equivalences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Petri nets and temporal logic are good at describing properties that pertain to the complete systems, however, they are relatively unstructured and not ideal for compositional verification[l 1]. Recent work on the compositionality or modularity of Petri nets [6,2,3,10] and the emergence of high-level timed Petri nets [7,17] has made them more attractive to the specification and analysis of complex real-time systems.…”
Section: Direct Waymentioning
confidence: 99%