Business Information Systems
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72035-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Comparative Business Process Modeling Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In highly competitive complex and rapidly changing markets, business decisions should be traceable and adaptable [35,30]. Decision automation is one way to reach this, by encoding business knowledge in an executable decision model [39].…”
Section: What Is Decision Automation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In highly competitive complex and rapidly changing markets, business decisions should be traceable and adaptable [35,30]. Decision automation is one way to reach this, by encoding business knowledge in an executable decision model [39].…”
Section: What Is Decision Automation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same is true for output KPIs in our context: These show increase or decrease of business performance, but give few or no clues on why this variation is happening. Also, typical KPIs say little about the relation between current vs optimal performance, which is an important business driver [35,30].…”
Section: Analytics Requirements For Decision Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FlowMake: The tool supports design time identification of errors in models before implementation in WFMS [32]. Graph reduction algorithm [33] is employed to verify workflows for syntactic correctness by identifying and eliminating structural conflicts like deadlocks and lack of synchronization. Correct structures are removed until the WF graph remains empty through a conflict reserving reduction process.…”
Section: Business Process Verification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following section briefly describes these parameters; Expressibility; assesses the degree to which an approach can represent any number of models in different application domains [54] [55]. In [33], the expressive power of a modelling technique was gauged in terms of its capability to represent specific process requirements. In our case, we consider expressiveness of a model verification tool in terms of the degree to which it supports one to verify different properties of cBP models given their specifications.…”
Section: Assessment Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on business process modeling is vast and the importance of measuring the success of process modeling projects and sessions has been widely recognized [1][2][3][4][5][6]. But prevalent success measures for individual modeling sessions primarily involve some form of model quality measure [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%