Developmental Psychopathology 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9780470939383.ch22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Dynamic Systems Methods for Developmental Psychopathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, family systems theory has provided rich accounts of family processes in the therapeutic context (Minuchin, 1974; Restifo & Bogels, 2009). Incorporation of dynamic systems methodologies such as state space grids that can quantify the hypotheses derived from family-systems theory is an important contribution to reduce the theory-method gap in developmental psychopathology (Granic & Hollenstein, 2006; Richters, 1997). Finally, several emerging models of adolescent psychopathology focus on the regulation of emotional arousal as a critical developmental process (Allen & Sheeber, 2008; Steinberg, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, family systems theory has provided rich accounts of family processes in the therapeutic context (Minuchin, 1974; Restifo & Bogels, 2009). Incorporation of dynamic systems methodologies such as state space grids that can quantify the hypotheses derived from family-systems theory is an important contribution to reduce the theory-method gap in developmental psychopathology (Granic & Hollenstein, 2006; Richters, 1997). Finally, several emerging models of adolescent psychopathology focus on the regulation of emotional arousal as a critical developmental process (Allen & Sheeber, 2008; Steinberg, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, methods developed to study the micro‐dynamics of activity in laboratory settings are readily utilized on daily sensor data (Gottman & Roy, ). Additionally, methods papers by Granic and colleagues and others (Granic & Hollenstein, ; Granic et al, ; de Barbaro, Johnson, Forster, & Deak, ) detail the discovery and quantification of theoretically meaningful structure in high‐density multimodal repeated measures data with consideration of longitudinal outcomes. Finally, sophisticated tools have been developed for longitudinal analyses of high‐density repeated‐measures data (Bolger & Laurenceau, ; Kim‐Spoon & Grimm, ; Krull, Cheong, Fritz, & MacKinnon, ).…”
Section: Pushing the Envelope: The Future Of Mobile Sensing In Develomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theoretical framework is based on a distillation of basic concepts at a principle-based level with some adaptation (for more comprehensive presentations, see Granic & Hollenstein, 2006; Lewis, 2005; Salvatore & Tschacher, 2012; Schiepek, Eckert, Aas, Wallot., & Wallot, 2015). Some might argue that one aspect or another of the framework is too crude, does not meet the exact specifications of dynamic systems modeling, or does not include important details.…”
Section: General Framework: Basic Principles Of Dynamic Systems Theormentioning
confidence: 99%