A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency Tables

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Abstract. The past decade has seen substantial research on exact inference for contingency tables, both in terms of developing new analyses and developing efficient algorithms for computations. Coupled with concomitant improvements in computer power, this research has resulted in a greater variety of exact procedures becoming feasible for practical use and a considerable increase in the size of data sets to which the procedures can be applied. For some basic analyses of contingency tables, it is unnecessary to use large-sample approximations to sampling distributions when their adequacy is in doubt. This article surveys the current theoretical and computational developments of exact methods for contingency tables. Primary attention is given to the exact conditional approach, which eliminates nuisance parameters by conditioning on their sufficient statistics. The presentation of various exact inferences is unified by expressing them in terms of parameters and their sufficient statistics in loglinear models. Exact approaches for many inferences are not yet addressed in the literature, particularly for multidimensional contingency tables, and this article also suggests additional research for the next decade that would make exact methods yet more widely applicable. Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Mortality in men with localized prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant hormone therapy

“…The men were stratified further by the median age. [8][9] The primary endpoint of this study was ACM, which was calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis. 10 Comparisons of this statistic across treatment groups were performed using a 2-sided log-rank test.…”

NKG2D Receptor Signaling Enhances Cytolytic Activity by Virus-Specific CD8+T Cells: Evidence for a Protective Role in Virus-Induced Encephalitis

“…Statistically significant differences between groups of mice were determined by t tests using Sigma-Stat 2.0 software (Jandel, Chicago, IL), and P values of Ͻ0.05 were considered significant. The statistical analysis for survival studies was performed by using the log-rank test, in which a P value of 0.05 or less was considered significant (2,49).…”

Cumulative Hip Contact Stress Predicts Osteoarthritis in DDH

“…In subjects whose body weight had changed over the years, we used the average between the body weight at the time the initial radiograph was taken and the body weight at followup. The differences between the study group and the control group in proportions of female hips, right-sided hips, asymptomatic hips at followup, and hips with THA at followup were tested with Fisher's exact test [1]. The study group of dysplastic hips and the control group of normal hips were matched on gender, number of right-sided hips, body mass index, race, and followup period (Table 1).…”