2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of fuzzy clustering validity evaluation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results of the comparative analysis, the choice was made in favor of the fuzzy-set approach [10][11]. It should be noted that this approach is actively used today to model complex situations in various industry specifics [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results of the comparative analysis, the choice was made in favor of the fuzzy-set approach [10][11]. It should be noted that this approach is actively used today to model complex situations in various industry specifics [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C F and inter-cluster separation S F are evaluation indexes of clustering algorithms, which are commonly used to judge the quality of clustering effect and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of clustering algorithms after clustering is completed [33]. A good clustering algorithm can produce high-quality clusters with high similarity within clusters and low similarity between clusters.…”
Section: Intra-cluster Compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te performance of the clustering algorithm can be evaluated by external evaluation criteria and internal evaluation criteria [22][23][24]. Te internal evaluation criteria are calculated based on the dissimilarity of objects in clusters, and the dissimilarity measure of several algorithms is different, and accordingly, the internal evaluation results of diferent algorithms will not be on the same scale.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of the Improved K-prototypesmentioning
confidence: 99%