Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3014812.3014825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of intelligent digital ink tools use in STEM education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study reported that students were faster and made fewer errors when writing equations by hand than typing those using keyboards, and more than 50% of the students in the sample preferred handwriting over typing mathematical expressions (Anthony et al, 2008 ). Although some researchers have compared typing vs. using digital ink tools for writing mathematics (Imtiaz et al, 2017 ), the effects of viewing mathematics presented in typed vs. handwritten fonts is unclear. In textbooks and online problems, mathematics is often presented in typed fonts; however, handwriting is still common in classroom and homework contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study reported that students were faster and made fewer errors when writing equations by hand than typing those using keyboards, and more than 50% of the students in the sample preferred handwriting over typing mathematical expressions (Anthony et al, 2008 ). Although some researchers have compared typing vs. using digital ink tools for writing mathematics (Imtiaz et al, 2017 ), the effects of viewing mathematics presented in typed vs. handwritten fonts is unclear. In textbooks and online problems, mathematics is often presented in typed fonts; however, handwriting is still common in classroom and homework contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%